Yeah, I was pumped after the last election. Well, not really, just thought it would be a good intro. After said election, things were gonna be different; the Dems would take up the fight for the people and be their voice in Washington. What are they whispering?

They came out with their 100 hour agenda and they pushed a bit through, they did do what they said. But now, after 100 days, what have they accomplished? What bills have been made into law?

All they have done is lip service, confrontation, photo-ops, yada yada. That said what have they really accomplished? They are an ambitious lot, but that is easy when you know that they DO NOT have the votes to do any of their so-called agenda.

Someone out there have an opinion? Let us hear it!

Reality most set in eventually, the Dems are NO better at keeping promises than the Repubs. If this is true, why do the American people continue with this charade? One word comes to mind–IGNORANCE.

CHUQ

This is a follow-up to my post about the Tech shootings.

Americans seem to have this bizarre need to know why death. Like the VA Tech deaths, they want to know every aspect of the story. Why? But yet something like nthe wars overseas and they accept whatever reason some feeble-minded politician gives them. Why? Why do they want to know why one person did this act, but not why the government would do it?

I guess it is easier for them to imagine one person being sick enough to kill people, but not their government. I have a had time with the mental process of the American people; they are so illogical in their thinking.

I am sure there is a sociologist somewhere that can answer my questions, but will I agree?

CHUQ

Now, hopefully, everyone is aware of the tragedy on the campus of VA tech, if not, please do me a favor and stay away from my Blog. The Media has found a easy story that they can analyze to death. For them it is easier than finding some other subject to cover. Why? A built in story that takes NO imagination to report.

Please do not misunderstand me, this is a tragedy and unacceptable behavior by a demented individual.

The media is analyzing this from every angle and I would suspect that the perpetrator’s penis was small and his feeling of inadequancy drove him to his acts. Not funny? I agree, but just watch the news and see the utter scrambling by the media to find a hook for the next “live” report.

I will do my best to explain things for those who think more slowly than others.

How could this happen?

A guy with guns shot people! That pretty much sums it up.

Why did he do it?

He was a demented individual that had access to guns and he used them.

What is the reaction?

Students are traumatized–students are dead–students are wounded–shooter is dead–law enforcement is scratching their heads in amazement. Anything else?

What are the implications?

American society needs help–lots of help! Media, with its never ending coverage, will assist any other demented a/hole, contemplated such an action, to decide to play this deadly game. This occurance, someone shooting someone, is a daily thing — and for that reason, it is a cultural thing.

Let’s see 50+ students injured or dead; the worst school shooting on record. What else do you need to know? How many died in Iraq and Afghanistan, yesterday? My point is–the students were not the only deaths yesterday. Move on and let the campus try to heal itself. The more coverage you give this, the more copycats will appear. If the thinking is cover this so that it willnever happen again–then you a/holes are dreaming!

The stupidity of the interviews–a woman says, “I heard shots”, a guy says, “he starting shooting” another student says he was shooting; ok you ass wipes, I got it the guy had guns and was shooting. How many times must we be told that fact. Let me see now, students are dead from gunshot wounds, right? I think that I have enough intelligence to figure out how they got that way. And it is also obvious to me that if you heard shots; someone has a gun. Please!

Why does the news media seem to think that they have to get us every angle? I say report on the act and then any new developements and give it a F*CKING rest. Apparently, most of the viewing public has IQ and shoe size about the same.

CHUQ

Environmentalism

Everyone, except a few paid opponents, see that the environment is in danger and that something must be done to preserve our way of life. Not bad! But the American people want the corporations to come up with the ideas for the survival of the planet. Laziness! It is everyone but their responsiblitiy to save the planet. They want alt energy so that they can continue their lifestyle. They do not want to be bothered with the problem. Unfortunately, dipsticks, YOU ARE the problem!

I mean they can come up with fuel additives and such, but if the American people continue down the path they are now on, they will be the reason that the planet craps out.

Just as in Iraq, no one wants to sacrifice. Nobody is willing to give up the inefficient vehicles or anything else that would effect them directly. They want the indirect method–let someone else find the problem and fix–they are just too busy being self-centered and lame. Americans give lip service to the problem of global warming, but that is about it. They say it is a problem that needs fixing, but they want someone elese to fix it.

I say make it hurt everyone, through taxes and such; once everyone begins to feel the pressure you can bet that something will get done. Make ALL pay, indivuals, corporations, etc. Higher axes on gas guzzlers, boats, emmissions of all types. This will ensure the American people will demand that a solution be found.

If everyone cannot get on board with helping save the planet, then I suggest you just sit back and observe the planet slowly expiring. God forbid that any of the people should have to sacrifice one iota to help the world.

The planet is dying, sports fans and YOU have a hand in the demise. Are you proud of yourself now?

CHUQ

13/04/07

Bush is looking for a new war czar, someone to take control of the daily operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. This person would report directly to Bush and be able to command different parts of the cabinet in the pursuit of the war.

So far he has had NO takers. Why is that? You would think that all the generals in waiting would jump on the opportunity–but no takers. One reason could be that when things finally go to the limit of crap, the czar would be the scapegoat and they probably see the in-fighting that would occur between the people with the czar stuck in the middle. The poor czar would be responsible for everything that would go wrong and be the buffer to take the heat off the pres.

Only an idiot would want this job. But I am sure he will find some ambitious a/hole to do it.

The preas may have to order someone to be his ass cover and you know what happens when a soldier disobeys an order. The generals who have turned him down are showing some backbone and are basically saying, you made the mistake–you take the responsibility!

Take a look at the drug czar, now that position has done what excatly? Has it helped win the war on drugs? ROFLMAO! So, what would be the advantage of having a war czar, I mean other than protecting the Pres ass? Not a damn thing–it will be as effective winning the war as the drug czar has been at eliminating the flow of drugs. A waste of time and money.

CHUQ

Just a few of the “important” stories of the past couple of days.

Prince whathis name of the UK is kicking his girlfriend to the curb. That should give the American people something to care about.

Some AZ teacher got caught humping a student. More important stuff!

A storeclerk got his teeth knocked out by a runaway car–please!

Imus was fired and meets with Rutgers team–move on!

People take “growth harmone” to extend youth.

Why would I be listing these? They are the most looked at stories on the web. Americans are a pathetic bunch of losers.

CHUQ

Depleted Uranium–A WMD?

May I say, Good Morning, sports fans! Today’s class will be on a subject that may or may not interest you. Since 9/11 the American people have been bombarded with the fear factor. All those little nations that want nuclear technology and are not on good terms with US, could be a source for the ingredients for a “dirty bomb” or in other words a weapon of mass destruction. I am sure you have heard of these, at least in passing anyway. I will expose you to a few terms and theories on the subject and YES, you will be responsible for the content of this lecture–It will be on a test!

Your professor would like to know if you know just what the hell a “dirty bomb” is? Please may I see a show of hands? Just as I thought, asleep at the wheel and I am not speaking of a rock tune for the past.

OK, a “dirty bomb” is defined as such:

The term dirty bomb is primarily used to refer to a radiological dispersal device (RDD), a radiological weapon which combines radioactive material with conventional explosives. Though an RDD is designed to disperse radioactive material over a large area, a bomb that uses conventional explosives would likely have more immediate lethal effect than the radioactive material. At levels created from most probable sources, not enough radiation would be present to cause severe illness or death. A test explosion and subsequent calculations done by the United States Department of Energy found that assuming nothing is done to clean up the affected area and everyone stays in the affected area for one year, the radiation exposure would be “fairly high”, but not fatal. Recent analysis of the Chernobyl accident fallout confirms this, showing that the effect on many people in the surrounding area, although not those in close proximity, was almost negligible.

As you can see that the death toll would be fairly minimal, but then the residual effects could be a major problem down the road. If a terrooist wanted the most bang for his buck, then the “dirty bomb” may not be the best avenue for him to travel. But if he wanted to do some permenant harm, it could be his cup of tea.

Now let’s move on. What about depleted uranium? I seem to see some vacuous stares out there. And I am guessing somewherre within your grey matter you are asking, what the (expletive) is depleted uranium?

Here you go–Depleted uranium (DU) is uranium that has a reduced proportion of the isotope Uranium-235. It is mostly made up of Uranium-238. The names Q-metal, depletalloy, and D-38, which once applied to depleted uranium, have fallen into disuse.

Its high density and pyrophoricity have made it a valued component in some military applications, particularly in the form of armour-piercing projectiles.

Its use in ammunition is controversial because it is released into the environment. Besides its residual radioactivity, U-238 is a heavy metal whose compounds are known from laboratory studies to be toxic to mammals, especially to the reproductive system and fetus development, causing reduced fertility, miscarriages and fetus malformations. It remains debatable whether depleted uranium is dangerous to human beings at the low quantities in which it is ingested from the environment.

Why are we talking about this? Well your favorite wars being waged as we speak, Iraq and Afghanistan, DU is used on armor piercing projectiles as well as some of the bunker busting bombs. As these are used to fight those darn pesky terrorists, it is finding its way into the eco-system, as well as being inhaled by troops as well as civilians.

It is immediate rsults will not be recognized for years, but eventually troops and civilians will start showing signs of exposure, to include infertility, birth defects, cancerous growths and an additional symptoms that have not yet been isolated. There is a possiblity that thousands and possibly as many as a million people could be effected in the future.

So you see, the original action may not cause a reaction but a long term effect can be expected. For that reason, I say it is a weapon of mass destruction and it is not being used by the terrorists, but rather the self-named savior of the Iraqi people, the US.

I will add that not all scientists agree with the findings of health risks, but keep in mind that there are those scientists that say there is no global warming, either.

CHUQ

13/04/07

On 9/11, the US was attacked by a bunch of dicks from al-Qaeda and then the pres declared war on terror. I remember Mr. Bush’s comment, “Bring it on”. You gotta love cowboy bravado! Well maybe not. From that frightful day, Bush has done everything in his power to enable and empower the terrorists, esecially al-Qaeda.

Across the world the terrorist organization has gained follower and momentum; he could not have done a better job of making the world more unsafe, even if that had been his plan all along. Attacks are going on daily across the world, most recently in Algeria; let us not forget Madrid, London, Morrocco, on and on. Will this ever curtail? Not for awhile, Bush offered a challenge to the “bad guys” and they seem to have taken him up on it.

My favorite statement right now is that if we leave Iraq the terrorist will follow us here. Scary thought, huh? But why has there not been another attack on the US? Is it our security measures? Not hardly, most of them are a joke! Then what is it?

IMO, the original attack was to get the US to over-react–it did and empowered al-Qaeda beyond its own attempt to expand. Al-Qaeda has become the premier terrorist group in the world. And now thanks to Bush and his WOT, the world has become even more dangerous than in the past. With each one of his lies that comes to light; he proves everything that he is accused of by terroists.

Will there be another attack on the US? Only developements in the next year or so will answer that question. US policy is NOT doing anything to defuse a volitile situation around the world. So, if you are afraid of the future, then the terrorsist are doing their job and doing it well. For FEAR is their best and most effective weapon.

CHUQ

12/04/07