Senate Impeachment Trial–Day 10

Did this silly drama end on Friday?

Well the answer is…NO IT DID NOT!

The Senate is taking the weekend off from President Trump’s impeachment trial. After voting Friday against hearing from witnesses, Democrats and Republicans came to a deal about how the next five days will go. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer introduced four amendments to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s resolution for how to end the trial, all having to do with subpoenaing witnesses; all were quickly voted down. Sources say Schumer could have dragged things out, but agreed not to if McConnell agreed to schedule the final vote for after Trump’s State of the Union address, which is coming up Tuesday. (But sources also tell Politico Trump’s lawyers asked for more time to prepare their closing arguments.) Then, per CNN, the Senate voted 53-47 to approve McConnell’s resolution laying out the schedule for the rest of the trial, and the trial was adjourned for the night.

Per McConnell’s resolution, the trial will resume Monday at 11am Eastern for up to four hours of closing arguments; House managers and Trump’s lawyers will get two hours each. Then it will be adjourned again until Wednesday at 4pm Eastern when a final vote on the articles of impeachment will be held (and Trump will almost certainly be acquitted). Between the adjournment Monday and the vote Wednesday, senators will be allowed to make floor speeches on the trial. Senate Majority Whip John Thune explained to CNN that Democrats planned to use “any number of dilatory tactics” to ensure the trial extended beyond the SOTU anyway, essentially forcing McConnell to cut the deal and spare senators late nights and weekend sessions. Sources say McConnell called Trump and got his approval for the timing. Also happening Monday? The Iowa caucuses, 2020’s first primary election; the schedule gives the four Senate Democrats running for president time to campaign.

So I have the weekend off from the madness and the utter silliness.

But the best thing all day was the vote on witness to be heard or not…..I mean it prtoves that this is a sham and a waste of time…..I mean why have witnesses to a crime during a trial…..

The Senate will not call witnesses to the impeachment trial. Senators rejected the measure 51-49 on Friday, with the GOP’s Mitt Romney and Susan Collins the only Republicans to vote with Democrats. The outcome had effectively been sealed earlier Friday when GOP Sen. Lisa Murkowski said she would vote against calling witnesses, reports NBC News. Coupled with Lamar Alexander’s same announcement Thursday night, that gave Mitch McConnell the votes he needed to block additional witnesses such as John Bolton. But will the trial be wrapped up in the wee hours of Friday as some have speculated? Maybe not. Coverage:

  • Next week? Politico reports that GOP senators and aides are warning that the trial might extend into next week after all. The proceedings could go on until Wednesday, meaning they would not be over before Trump’s State of the Union address on Tuesday and the Iowa caucuses on Monday. This would allow for lengthy closing arguments from both sides, as well as speeches from senators from the chamber’s floor.
  • More from Bolton: The New York Times has more details from the former national security adviser’s upcoming memoir that relates to the impeachment trial. Bolton writes that Trump asked him for help pressuring Ukraine to investigate politico foes two months before the president’s famous phone call with Ukraine’s president. This would mark the earliest known such effort by Trump. Bolton asserts that Trump asked him to make sure Ukraine’s president met with Rudy Giuliani.
  • And more: Bolton also wrote that top White House aides including chief of staff Mick Mulvaney, Giuliani, and White House counsel Pat Cipollone (who is defending Trump in the trial) were in the room at the time. Giuliani called the claim “categorically untrue.”
  • Trump denies: “I never instructed John Bolton to set up a meeting for Rudy Giuliani, one of the greatest corruption fighters in America and by far the greatest mayor in the history of N.Y.C., to meet with President Zelensky,” Trump said in a statement. “That meeting never happened.”
  • Murkowski elaborates: “The House chose to send articles of impeachment that are rushed and flawed,” said the Alaska senator in a statement. “I carefully considered the need for additional witnesses and documents, to cure the shortcomings of its process, but ultimately decided that I will vote against considering motions to subpoena,” Murkowski said in a statement.
  • Alexander elaborates: On Friday, Alexander explained his thinking on Trump’s behavior, saying it was inappropriate but not impeachable. “It seemed to me that the president did it, he did what he was accused of,” Alexander said, per the Washington Post. “There’s a difference between inappropriate conduct, which that clearly is, and treason, bribery, high crimes, and misdemeanors. … I think there’s a big gap between this conduct and impeachable conduct.”
  • Dershowitz: Trump attorney Alan Dershowitz has become a “lightning rod” for criticism, per the Hill, but Dershowitz tells the outlet his role on the defense team has been limited. “I did not participate in strategic decisions or tactical decisions about witnesses or anything like that,” he said. “I just delivered my constitutional argument and made myself available to answer questions.” His argument: That Trump should not be impeached because he did not commit a crime.

This is a textbook trial all right…..I will be used to show how to get away with a crime by a president……I hope the GOP remembers that they did this to the country and its people.

Maybe the voters will finally show some intelligence and get these corrupt slugs out of government.

We will see…..more to come next week…..

Watch This Blog!

I Read, I Write, You Know

“lego ergo scribo”

2020 Dems–Another One Bites The Dust #13

Events are conspiring against me…..

Just days away from the very beginning of the 2020 voting cycle and another Dem has called it quits…..

The field is getting thinner by the week…….

This time it is the ex-Congressman of Maryland, John Delaney…..

Who?

Not to worry few know his either…..but not a problem for he is gone now…..

The Democratic field shrank again Friday morning, but casual followers of the campaign might struggle to place the name: John Delaney. The former Maryland congressman and current multi-millionaire businessman announced his departure online and said he did not want to hurt other moderate candidates in the race, reports the Washington Post. The move comes just days ahead of the Iowa caucuses. Delaney was barely registering in the polls—support in Iowa rounded to 0%, notes Politico—but it wasn’t for lack of trying: He was the first Democrat to formally join the race, and he did so in July 2017, just six months after President Trump entered the White House.

Delaney visited all of Iowa’s 99 counties by August 2018, before bigger names even announced they were running, notes USA Today. “lt has been a privilege to campaign for the Democratic nomination for president, but it is clear that God has a different purpose for me at this moment in time,” Delaney tweeted. During his campaign, Delaney promised to put forth only bipartisan proposals during his first 100 days in office. “Wouldn’t it be amazing if a president looked at the American people at the inauguration and said, ‘I represent every one of you, whether you voted for me or not and this is how I’m going to prove it,'” he told ABC News last year.

My candidate is still in there slugging away….

And I will keep with tradition and let Queen show Delaney th exit door……

The field should start thinning even more after Iowa and the other early votes…..

I Read, I Write, You Know

“lego ergo scribo”