Why the US Military Opposed New Combat Roles in Iraq by Gareth Porter — Antiwar.com

There has been a promise by the president that there will be NO combat role in Iraq for US Troops…….many have argued that they have such a role as the conflict stands now.

There has been a multi-facet conversation on this subject……some on the Right are chest thumping about ending the conflict once and for all with US troops…..the Left has not been so bold but secretly are saying that there has to be a way to end this thing in Iraq……..

The Joint Chiefs have voiced an opinion and some will not like or appreciate their thoughts……

 

Why the US Military Opposed New Combat Roles in Iraq by Gareth Porter — Antiwar.com.

2 thoughts on “Why the US Military Opposed New Combat Roles in Iraq by Gareth Porter — Antiwar.com

  1. It would be much better for the American Military if the civilians in Congress would let the generals run the wars (or) if a law were passed requiring that every elected official needs to have been in the military as a qualification of their candidacy.

    jliming.com

Leave a Reply