According to most pundits Clinton will win this election in a landslide…..(God help us)…..if true Clinton’s biggest problem will be….what to do with Syria……does she have a plan?
The American Conservative has a couple of good pieces about Clinton and Syria…….and her possible plan/s………
In a seemingly full-throated promise to voters in Scranton, Pa. on Monday, Hillary Clinton said adding “American ground troops” in the war against ISIS in Syria “is off the table.”
But every message coming from her surrogates in the media and in the Washington defense establishment has been that she will “lean in” harder in Syria, and whether you want to call it “added ground troops” or something else, everyone in her orbit is calling for expanded U.S. intervention—including personnel and firepower—in the region, even at the risk of confrontation with Russia.
Source: Clinton’s Syria War Plans | The American Conservative
She may go full-throat into Syria to appease her M-IC handlers……in true neocon fashion…..
Kelley Vlahos reminds us why Clinton is likely to be very hawkish as president:
But every message coming from her surrogates in the media and in the Washington defense establishment has been that she will “lean in” harder in Syria, and whether you want to call it “added ground troops” or something else, everyone in her orbit is calling for expanded U.S. intervention—including personnel and firepower—in the region, even at the risk of confrontation with Russia.
We have good reason to believe this because Clinton and her supporters repeatedly keep saying that this is the kind of foreign policy her administration will have. Clinton has made no secret of her support for “no-fly” and safe zones in Syria, and she has chosen a running mate who shares her views on these issues. While Democrats overall might be divided on Syria policy, the Democratic ticket is not: both nominees favor a more aggressive, militarized U.S. role in the Syrian conflict. That is the policy a Clinton administration is very likely to start implementing next year if, as seems likely, she prevails in the fall. A vote for Clinton is almost certainly a vote for an expanded war in Syria, and the public needs to understand that this is what we will get by entrusting her with the presidency.
Source: A Clinton Win Means An Expanded War in Syria | The American Conservative

Something the military has to look forward to…..a bigger and wider footprint for the US troops…..
A Clinton win will be bad for the country but a windfall of profits for the M-IC………
The voters and the people of this country deserves better than a continuous war for a generation…..but will we step up and tell the candidate that this all MUST stop? (He asked knowing full well the answer is NO!)
Well frankly, Russia does just as many bad things as us. Trump seems to believe that ISIL is just threatening American interest. He knows nothing about the Genocide. I will see how well third parties are doing after three weeks! But the fact is Hillary is the Devil we know.
I am hoping that 3rd parties will start making in-roads….yes she is….
Reblogged this on The Militant Negro™.
According to the 7/13/16 HILL article by Kristina Wong, the verdict is still out as to what HRC’s Syrian policy will be. Some of her foreign policy advisers including Michele Flournoy, are pushing for a more forceful intervention but others disagree with that approach, including Phil Gordon of the Council on Foreign Relations, a former Obama administration official.
Last month, Gordon published a paper recommending the administration drop its demand that Assad leave Syria as part of a negotiated political transition. He also advocated that position during a roundtable with reporters in May.
Ambassador Frederic C. Hof, Obama’s former special adviser for transition in Syria, said it is hard to tell where Clinton will end up.
“I would suspect that Secretary Clinton will not allow much in the way of differences to emerge between her and President Obama,” he said. “What this will probably translate into is no great critiques of Syria policy coming out of the Clinton campaign.”
I can’t accept your premise as a given but it is a possibility. Hopefully the will have to answer pointed questions about what her policy towards Syria is during the upcoming debates.
Time will tell, Gronda
I don’t think the debates will be as good as some think….I see more one liners and slogans for applause….I want to see who she appoints to the positions at State and Defense….
An interesting piece…https://theinternationalreporter.org/2016/08/23/how-clintonites-are-preparing-for-war-in-syria/