Please forgive me if I do not comment soon as usual….today I am playing tag with my doctors….always a real joy (sarcasm)……I will get back as soon as possible please bear with me…..
Have you noticed that in the conversation about Islam and such…all the Western experts are named Smith, Jackson, Hightower, Strickland or Rosenbaum? I guess the more Anglo-Saxon you are the more of an expert you become.
When I was young my grandfather told me there was power in words…that the pen was mightier than the sword…….(not his saying)……but I never knew just how powerful some words were…..(I have been schooled)…..
Since the conventions are in full swing has anyone noticed that the Right wingers have not used the term “Radical Islam” for awhile now? But I am sure that will change any day now.
For a couple of years most notably since ISIS has been on its barbarous rampage there has been a bunch of mental deficient that are ate up with the term “Radical Islam….it seems that they are more concerned that the president will not use the term (basically because they want him to) and for that reason we cannot defeat a bunch of terrorists.
Personally, I think it is more that without his use of the term then they would have very little to write about…..can you think of any other subject more contentious than the use of terminology?
The recent verbal attacks by the Republican presumptive nominee Donald Trump and his supporters on President Barack Obama for avoiding the phrase “radical Islam” in his public pronouncements are simplistic, racially inflammatory — and flatly misinformed.
Settling upon accurate and strategically nuanced terms to describe the post-9/11 enemy is not the product of “political correctness” (contra Trump) or a failure to understand the enemy (contra a much-discussed Atlantic cover story). Nor are objections to using overly broad terms like “Islamic radicalism” limited to Democrats. The Bush administration understood the power of words, too. It concluded that distinctions that may seem small to Christian-American ears make a big difference to the mainstream Muslims we need on our side.
Source: I worked in the CIA under Bush. Obama is right to not say “radical Islam.” – Vox
But never fear (this is for my Right turd readers)…..Donald has a plan (makes about as much sense as any of his other issue solutions)…..to defeat those pesky bastards, ISIS……

Does anyone believe that ISIS can be defeated through terminology?
I guess they do or the terminology would not be such an issue….maybe we should just find some ram horns and blow them at the enemy…..if it can destroy walls then it damn sure should be able to defeat a person or persons, right?
It took simpletons to find the answer to defeating this barbarous group….words!
Who knew?
Absolutely LOVED this piece.
Check out my Political Meme in support of it: http://bit.ly/2ba0YIT
LOL….stop! Thanx I needed a good chuckle this AM….chuq
I aim to please. Hence the Archer. (This theme will be on constant repeat!)
There was actually an active CIA under Bush? I remember the Bush Era as being the one where you could be branded as a traitor if you didn’t agree with everything he said and did. What was the function of the CIA under that particular reign of Patriot Act terror?
Replace the word, “Terror” in my previous comment with “Repression.” Thanks.
Actually, words WILL do the trick, if they are the right words, at the right time. If I were in a room with the bankers/assholes responsible for funneling money to ISIS, with a gun in MY hand, and I said to them; “you will now cease funding war.”, then shot them all in the head, we might see some changes….
Oh, I guess that’s words AND a bullet. Oh well, can’t blame a guy for trying….
Random thoughts in passing, as I heal….
See ya, bro…
gigoid, the dubious
I feel your pain today….had an incident with my leg….chuq