Take Me To Your Leader

I have been saying for the start of this election cycle that there was NO one that had any idea about how to be a leader on the world stage.  And so far I have seen leader from either of the two nominees…..

Foreign policy will be big this time around…there is so much crap going on in the world and our choices for handling these situations are limited and not looking so good……

Which candidates show the leadership this country desperately needs?

Let’s start with the GOP candidate for president, Donald Trump……

Many downwardly mobile Americans are confused about what happened to them, which explains the attraction of Donald Trump, who offers few coherent solutions but may have a lasting impact on U.S. relations with the world,

Donald Trump most likely will not be elected President. Still, his historic campaign has sent shock waves through the American body politic. All are asking what it means and what it portends. The focus is on America at home rather than abroad. Foreign policy issues have been overshadowed by anxious domestic concerns.

Moreover, Trump never formulated a coherent view of international issues. Like the average guy, he simply spat out whatever thoughts passed through his head as he had caught snippets of Fox News. Any attempt to discern logic and strategy from Trump’s disjointed exclamations proves frustrating.

Source: A Lasting Trump Stamp on Foreign Policy – Consortiumnews

Nothing about Trump fills me with confidence.

How about the Dems choice, Hillary Clinton?

Hillary Clinton, Democratic presidential nominee, has derided “Don’t do stupid stuff” as a worthless organizing principle of President Barack Obama’s foreign policy.

But her substitute of “Doing stupid stuff” is even worse.

As Secretary of State during President Barack Obama’s first term, Ms. Clinton single-handedly compounded problems of international terrorism, nuclear proliferation, war, refugees, and human rights from North Korea and China to South Asia, the Middle East and North Africa to Europe and Russia.

In sum, Ms. Clinton foreign policy makes former President George W. Bush look like a Talleyrand, Metternich, or Bismarck.

Source: Hillary Clinton’s Foreign Policy: Doing Stupid Stuff | Huffington Post

Another dud in the making…..confidence at ZERO!

Just maybe it is time to re-think the term “leadership”…….

As a retired lieutenant colonel for the U.S. Army, I want to be positive. Even when I’ve identified major conceptual and practical failures in the conduct of American foreign and military policy, I’ve suggested alternatives that could improve the situation. But when looking at the state of our foreign policy in this moment, and given how entrenched the foreign-policy elite in Washington has become, a rational optimism is getting more and more difficult to find.

In practice, the current administration tries to keep a lid on problems by applying limited military power—at least regarding troop levels—over large sections of the globe. These military operations are tactical in nature, designed to achieve small-scale results, without the consideration of how or even whether they support some larger strategic objective.

Source: Let’s Rethink What ‘Leadership’ Means in Foreign Policy | The American Conservative

With confidence lacking there is only one thought that comes to mind……on the international stage this country is so screwed!

7 thoughts on “Take Me To Your Leader

  1. Oh man, I think this country was screwed years ago and we’re only now seeing the horrible results. The U.S. government needs to re-learn what it means to “do unto others as you want others to do unto you.”

  2. Very well thought, well written article, backed obviously by experience. As for me, I’ll go with Hillary’s succinct explanation of US foreign policy: We came, we saw, he died, followed by a loud guffah. The world is likely to see much more of that in the coming years until the Washington cabal that highjack the government of the US is overthrown, likely in a military coup which will then establish a military dictatorship over the Security State. I mean, the US is already a security state dictatorship, but it’s not in the hands of the military. That’s the inevitable next step. Will it be a benign dictatorship, or of a violently repressive nature? Based on the demographics, it will begin as an attempt to pacify, and that will turn to totalitarian repression. Then the “union” will break up in smaller rebellious units and the land will burn. My prediction for this morning based on some dreams I’ve had recently. Enjoy the results of the election, doesn’t matter who “wins” the jackpot.

    1. Terrifying dreams…but I cannot argue with them…..I will return to my normal stuff after a day or so…..there is much gonna change and not all will be for the better….chuq

  3. I’m here late; the election is over now, & we know the full extent of our folly. Since the future, as yet, exists only in dreams, I’ll leave further comments for later, and merely repeat my initial reaction to the election results, which remains the same after consideration, to wit:

    “And now there is merely silence, silence, silence, saying all we did not know.” — William Rose Benet

    I’m going to skip some posts, & catch up down the line, during tomorrow’s run….

    gigoid, the dubious

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.