Everybody these days has something to say about this AI thing.
There has been a wealth of wide ranging posts and stories about this thing we call AI….even in the blogging world it has become popular authors employing it for posts and even comments.
There are both pro and cons in the usage of this technology.
I read an interesting article recently that takes a look at AI and productivity growth…..
It is really painful to see the regular flow of pieces debating whether AI will lead to mass unemployment. Invariably, these pieces are written as though the author has taken an oath that they have no knowledge of economics whatsoever.
The NYT gave us the latest example on Sunday, in a piece debating how many jobs will be affected by AI. As the piece itself indicates, it is not clear what “affected by AI” even means.
What percent of jobs were affected by computers? The answer would probably be pretty close to 100 percent, if by “affected” we mean in some way changed. If by affected, we mean eliminated, then we clearly are talking about a much smaller number.
Thinking of AI like we did about computers is likely a good place to start. First of all, we should remember that there were predictions of massive layoffs and unemployment from computers and robots for decades. This did not happen.
In fact, we have a measure of the extent to which computers, robots, and other technology are displacing workers. It’s called “productivity growth,” and the Labor Department gives us data on it every quarter.
Productivity is the measure of the value of output that a worker can produce an hour. We expect this to increase through time as we get better equipment and software, we learn how to do things better, and workers get more educated.
For the last two centuries, productivity growth has been a normal feature of the U.S. economy, and in fact, most normally functioning economies around the world. This is the basis for rising living standards through time. It is the reason that we can feed our whole population, and still export food, even with just around 1.0 percent of the workforce in agriculture, as opposed to more than 50 percent in the 19th century.
The big question is the rate at which productivity grows. Productivity growth has actually been pretty slow in recent years. It averaged just 1.3 percent annually since 2006. By contrast, it averaged close to 3.0 percent in the quarter century from 1947 to 1973.
AI, Job Loss and Productivity Growth
I am told that people cannot tell the difference between actual writing and the AI generated….if that is true why bother doing the writing?
I use quotes and my own thoughts…I do not use or need help.
Be aware I said ‘I’….that does not mean that I condemn the use….just that it is not for me.
That out of the way….
Any thoughts?
I Read, I Write, You Know
“lego ergo scribo”

