I get a lot of grief from people that know I am not a Clinton supporter for the nomination…..most think it has to do with gender….they are seriously mistaken……I will not vote for her because I feel that she will be just an extension of Bubba’s policies and I think he did more harm than good as president.
For instance, it was his admin that repealed Glass-Staegall which led to the meltdown of 2008 and it was her hubby that went crazy with throwing people in prison….leading to the overcrowding we have today…..there is more but this post is about her not Bubba…..
I did not agree with Bill Clinton on much as far as foreign policy goes either. here again I feel that she will be the hawk that hubby was….even with her State Department experience she will be ultra militaristic…..in my opinion.
She recently went to the Brookings Institute for a speech and she removed all doubt in my mind……
If Hillary Clinton is already this hawkish while trying to fend off Bernie Sanders in the Democratic primary, imagine what she’ll be doing and saying in the general election or, worse, while in the Oval Office as “Commander-in-Chief.”
Source: Hillary Clinton Goes to Militaristic, Hawkish Think Tank, Gives Militaristic, Hawkish Speech
You decide what is what with Hillary……but for my money she is just another neocon in Democratic clothing……
Thoughts?
All women candidates have to produce this tough image so not to be perceived as weak by some male voters. It’s a shame that our gender nurturers have to forego their most valuable asset
Yes, very true.
In the mean time run for cover….
She is being supported because she is supposedly a feminist.
In my book you support someone regardless of gender.
Dreadful woman.
A sycophant.
I could be ruder.
I agree with you…..a candidate should not be defined by gender…unfortunately that is how we roll…..chuq