Inkwell Institute
Middle East Desk
That is the excuse that was given for the entry of the US into the actions against Libya….Qaddahfi said that he would kill everyone who opposed him in the town of Misrata…..that promise brought the world to the decision that NATO must take him to task and prevent a humanitarian crisis……Now that so many in Washington are stomping their feet for an end to the Libyan action….some, like McCain are still using the humanitarian thing as a reason for continuation of “hostilities”…….
I have asked the same question since the beginning of the Libyan operation……when does a situation become a humanitarian crisis? So far, I have NO definitive explanation. Then I ask, if we are hell bound to intercede in humanitarian crises….why was Rwanda or Sudan not worthy of our intervention? There were actual people killed in those two countries and not just a threat by a despot……..why were these countries ignored?
Now we come to Syria….is it a humanitarian crisis? Over 1,200 people, most of them civilians, have been killed in the violent suppression of protests that began in March, and more than 10,000 have been detained. “widespread human rights violations” included “violated freedoms of assembly, expression and movement”, “excessive use of force in quelling demonstrators, arbitrary detentions, summary executions, torture and other cruel or inhuman treatment”. “Syrian security forces directly blocked the distribution of critical food supplies in certain locations”, depriving Syrians of basic food resources.
When does the Syrian situation become serious enough to be called a Humanitarian crisis? Other than some limited sanctions and a wealth of lip service. I think we all would like to hear the real story of the problems in Syria and just what are the plans…….what criteria are they using to determine what is or is not a humanitarian crisis?