Closing Thought–29Jan20

Ever wonder where your state fits on the graph of the smartest or the dumbest?

Well I do have an answer for you….

  1. Massachusetts
  2. Maryland
  3. Colorado
  4. Vermont
  5. Connecticut
  6. Virginia
  7. Washington
  8. New Hampshire
  9. New Jersey
  10. Minnesota

Next: the 10 least educated states.

  1. Mississippi
  2. West Virginia
  3. Louisiana
  4. Arkansas
  5. Alabama
  6. Kentucky
  7. South Carolina
  8. Nevada
  9. New Mexico
  10. Tennessee

Check out how other states fared here. (These are the states with the best and worst economies.)

Sad to see that my state is once again the top of some awful societal thing…..we are the fattest, the least healthy, most littered, and now the least educated…….


Are not those states the ones that support Trump the the least educated that is?

Damn what a coincidence.

Just wondering

I Read, I Wrote, You Know

“lego ergo scribo”

Senate Impeachment Trial–Day 7

The saga continues as the Trump team makes their case for a dismissal……what magic has his managers worked on the process?

There seems to be NO end to the blame game……on Obama.

So how did the day go?

Much of the second day of President Trump’s impeachment defense focused not on the president’s actions, but on the previous administration. In what Politico calls “an alternate-reality impeachment of his political rivals,” Trump lawyers Pam Bondi and Eric Herschmann argued that former President Obama and Joe Biden should be the ones under investigation for abuse of power. They claimed that Obama had engaged in a quid pro quo with Russia under then-President Dmitry Medvedev and argued that Joe and Hunter Biden’s activities in Ukraine should be the target of a corruption probe. Joe Biden led the Obama administration’s Ukraine policy. More:

  • Biden rejects “conspiracy theory.” Bondi, a former Florida AG, argued that Trump had good reason to seek an investigation of the younger Biden’s role on the board of Ukrainian energy company Burisma, and of his father’s actions as VP during that time, the Washington Post reports. A rep for Biden, who is on the campaign trail in Iowa, said Bondi was talking about a discredited “conspiracy theory.” Biden told reporters he saw no reason to testify. “The reason he’s being impeached is because he tried to get a government to smear me and they wouldn’t,” he said.
  • “We do not deal with speculation.” While John Bolton’s Ukraine claims led to renewed calls for more witnesses to be allowed, with GOP Sen. Mitt Romney calling the move increasingly likely, the Trump team dismissed them as speculation, Fox reports. “We deal with transcript evidence, we deal with publicly available information,” Trump lawyer Jay Sekulow. “We do not deal with speculation, allegations that are not based on evidentiary standards at all.”
  • Trump blasts Bolton. Trump’s commentary on the impeachment trial Monday included retweets of remarks from Bolton critics, including this retweet from Sen. Rand Paul: “Why didn’t John Bolton testify to the US House? Apparently his book wasn’t quite finished yet for presales!”
  • Dershowitz condemns process. Celebrity lawyer Alan Dershowitz was Monday’s final speaker, and he argued that “purely non-criminal conduct, including abuse of power and obstruction of Congress, are outside the range of impeachable offenses.” He also addressed the Bolton issue, saying “nothing in the Bolton revelations, even if true, would rise to the level of an abuse of power or an impeachable offense,” the AP reports.
  • Dershowitz vs. Dershowitz? Vox notes that Democrats pushing back against Republican arguments that no crimes have been committed have pointed to a Government Accountability Office decision last month that found holding up aid to Ukraine violated the Impoundment Control Act of 1974. They have also brought up some of Dershowitz’s previous opinions. “It certainly doesn’t have to be a crime if you have somebody who completely corrupts the office of president and who abuses trust and who poses great danger to our liberty, you don’t need a technical crime,” the lawyer said in 1998. He said Monday that he had changed his mind on the issue.
  • What to watch for Tuesday. On the final day of Trump’s defense, the president’s lawyers will “seek to drive home the argument that the House made a shoddy case, and the Senate need not reach in and bolster it by hearing new evidence,” the New York Times reports.
  • The next step. Senators will now get a voice in the process for the first time. In a 16-hour question-and-answer session, written questions from senators from both parties will be answered by House impeachment managers and Trump’s lawyers. Only one of the 150 questions in Bill Clinton’s impeachment trial came from a bipartisan pair of senators and it’s not clear whether there will be any at all this time, the Hill reports.

The argument portion of the trial is now over with the Trump teams closing statements…..

The arguments in President Trump’s impeachment trial are over, even as the debate on whether John Bolton should be called as a witness rages on. Trump’s defense team wrapped up its three days of arguments Tuesday; next up, senators will be allowed to ask the House managers and Trump’s legal team questions for a total of 16 hours. That will take place during two sessions Wednesday and Thursday during which “the questions alternate between the majority and minority sides for up to eight hours,” Mitch McConnell announced before adjourning the trial until 1pm Wednesday. Questions must be submitted in writing in advance to Chief Justice John Roberts, who will ask them; five minutes will be allowed per answer. Tuesday’s big developments, including an update on page 2 regarding the vote on whether witnesses will be allowed, below.

  • Bad precedent? This is “the trial of the leader of the free world and the duly elected president of the United States,” said Trump attorney Jay Sekulow, per the Washington Post. “It is not a game of leaks and unsourced manuscripts. … To lower the bar of impeachment based on these articles of impeachment would impact the functioning of our constitutional republic and the framework of that Constitution for generations.”
  • Defend the Constitution: White House Counsel Pat Cipollone wrapped up the defense team’s arguments with a call to senators: “What they are asking you to do is to throw out a successful president on the eve of an election with no basis and in violation of the Constitution. It would dangerously change our country and … weaken forever all of our democratic institutions. You all know that’s not in the interests of the American people. Why not trust the American people with this decision. Why tear up their ballots, why tear up every ballot across this country. You can’t do that. You know you can’t do that. So I ask you to defend our Constitution, to defend fundamental fairness, to defend basic due process rights, but most importantly—most importantly, to respect and defend the sacred right of every American to vote and to choose their president.”
  • Bolton book: Sekulow downplayed the significance of the Bolton book, referring to “an unpublished manuscript that maybe some reporters have an idea of maybe what it says.” The resulting evidence, “if you want to call that evidence,” is “inadmissible,” he added.
  • Bolton testimony: There is no resolution yet on whether Trump’s former national security adviser will be called to testify about Trump’s Ukraine dealings. On Tuesday, Trump ally Lindsey Graham backed the idea of senators reading Bolton’s manuscript in a classified setting, reports Mediaite. Democrats want Bolton to testify publicly instead.
  • Hypocritical? Democratic Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse said the GOP idea to read Bolton’s manuscript privately is a “laugh out loud” one: “They spent days criticizing us going into a secret bunker, and now they want to take a public document and put it in a secret bunker? Whiff of desperation is what I’ll call it.” Adam Schiff echoed that: “After all the complaints they made about the depositions, it’s very ironic that they’re making such a strong case” for a closed-door deposition with Bolton, he said.
  • The decision: When the senators’ 16-hour question period ends, the chamber will have up to four hours of debate on whether to call witnesses, reports NBC News. Senate Republicans met after Tuesday’s session adjourned to discuss the issue internally. Just four Republicans could give Democrats the votes they need for witnesses to be called.
  • Speaking of those votes: Late Tuesday afternoon, news broke that during that closed-door meeting, McConnell told GOP senators they do not yet have the votes to block witnesses. That doesn’t mean they won’t have them by the time the vote takes place, as several senators are still undecided.
  • A slight shift: CNN notes that since Bolton’s upcoming book started making headlines (it reportedly reveals that Trump told Bolton he was indeed withholding military aid from Ukraine until the country announced an investigation of the Bidens), Republicans are increasingly acknowledging the president may indeed have leveraged the aid—but that doing so is not impeachable, and that the Bolton revelation does not require witness testimony since it simply confirms what has already been established. It also doesn’t change the fact that Democrats don’t have the votes to remove the president from office.
  • A challenge: On Tuesday morning, Trump tweeted a criticism of Fox News for giving air time to Democratic Sen. Chris Van Hollen. The Maryland senator responded via Twitter himself: “Glad you tuned in, Mr. President,” he wrote. “Now that I have your attention, how about coming down to the Senate to share your side of the story under penalty of perjury?”

I know a lot to take in….but we are talking about the future of the presidency……this trial will determine how the country is run by the next generation of people.

Yes it is that goddamn important!

Watch This Blog!

I Read, I Wrote, You Know

“lego ergo scribo”

Big News From Trump

News that gives me hope.

I find many people think I am a Never Trump person (a post for a later day)…..or those that accuse me have the attention span of a garden slug……it is true that I do not like the man or some of his ideas and in the past I have defended some of his ideas especially about our many wars.

And I have found another idea that I can support from the mind of Trump…..lower insulin prices for seniors….

The Trump administration is working on a proposal to lower seniors’ out-of-pocket costs for insulin, which have nearly doubled over the last decade.

Why it matters: Voters care deeply about prescription drug prices, and if the policy comes to fruition, it could both help seniors afford their insulin and give the administration political points.

Details: The White House, the Department of Health and Human Services and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services are jointly working on the policy.

  • Details are unclear or undecided. One idea is to give insurers an incentive to offer plans with lower cost-sharing, a source familiar said.
  • “The goal is to make sure it’s technically sound and if it helps patients, get it out” as soon as possible, a senior administration official said.
  • A CMS spokesperson declined to comment.

I hope this is a true concern for seniors and not some ploy to win more votes in November…..the only way this will happen is if Big Pharma is eliminated from the decision making process….and that is hard for me to imagine.

As it is now profit is far more important than the lives of our seniors…..and these groups have a strong and massive army of lobbyists to see that this idea will die a rapid death.

It is possible the Pharma could support this idea….if they do then ask what has been giving to get that approval.

I support this attempt and a hope he can pull it off.

Watch This Blog!

I Read, I Wrote, You Know

“lego ergo scribo”


If you care just a little about what the US is doing in Afghanistan then I have a report for you……DoD 1225 Report On Afghanistan….

On January 23, 2020, The Department of Defense provided to Congress the DOD 1225 report on Afghanistan. The semiannual report, Enhancing Security and Stability in Afghanistan, covers events during the period of June 1 to November 30, 2019.

The principle goal of the U.S. strategy in Afghanistan has not changed during this reporting period. It remains to achieve a “durable and inclusive political settlement to the war that protects the United States homeland from terrorist attacks.” The U.S. is currently engaged in efforts to find a political settlement with the Taliban and the U.S. military mission is in support of diplomatic efforts to achieve a political settlement as well as to conduct counterterrorism operations.

This 93-page 1225 report states that there are still challenges within the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces (ANDSF). Chief among these challenges are corruption, attrition of the force, and the inability to conduct logistical planning. These challenges remain a focus of the Resolute Support Mission.

The report is divided into several sections:

  • Section 1 – Strategy and Objectives
  • Section 2 – Threat Assessment
  • Section 3 – Overview of ANDSF
  • Section 4 – MOD and ANA
  • Section 5 – MOI and ANP
  • Section 6 – Financing the ANDSF
  • Annex A – Acronyms

Enhancing Security and Stability in Afghanistan
DOD 1225 Report, December 2019
U.S. Department of Defense

I think all Americans should read this report and check to see where your money is being spent….then take a look if it is being spent wisely (hint:  It is NOT)

Click to access 1225-REPORT-DECEMBER-2019.PDF

But how is this conflict going?

Glad you asked for I can present you with an answer…..

A sampling of curated news, commentary, and analysis about America’s longest war – or the Afghanistan quagmire . Topics include security, governance, Resolute Support, ANDSF, elections, peace negotiations, and more from the past month.

Afghanistan Conflict Update – January 2020

If you want the best information available on our many wars then I suggest that you…..

Watch This Blog!

I Read, I Wrote, You Know

“lego ergo scribo”