Would a Clinton Win Mean More Wars?

NO surprise I am not a Clinton fan…..to me she is just another neocon in Dem clothing…..meaning she will press the US into more and more war…..

This article by Robert Parry confirms my fears…..

Savvy neocons see Hillary Clinton as their Trojan Horse to be pulled into the White House by Democratic voters, raising the question: would a Clinton-45 presidency mean more wars, asks Robert Parry.

The Democratic Party establishment seems determined to drag Hillary Clinton’s listless campaign across the finish line of her race with Bernie Sanders and then count on Republican divisions to give her a path to the White House. But – if she gets there – the world should hold its breath.

If Clinton becomes President, she will be surrounded by a neocon-dominated American foreign policy establishment that will press her to resume its “regime change” strategies in the Middle East and escalate its new and dangerous Cold War against Russia.

Source: Would a Clinton Win Mean More Wars? – Consortiumnews

Den voters are falling for her con job and we will live to regret electing her president.

To answer the question posited in the title……YES IT DOES!

6 thoughts on “Would a Clinton Win Mean More Wars?

  1. Paul Mason ‏@paulmasonnews 9h9 hours ago

    ‘Clinton’s Candidacy = Nadir of Bourgeois Identity Politics – as *poor* black ppl, gay ppl and women will find out once Wall Street Wins’
    Check him out!
    on Twitter….;)

  2. Yes. Then again, this is America! War is ALL it does anymore. There would be more war with Clinton. There would be more war with Trump. More war with Cruz. More war with Bernie. More war with Gandhi. More wars with the fucking Dali Lama!

    And the Neo-Cons and the MISC Industries will be the puppeteers & the profiteers.

Leave a Reply