The Last SOTU

Alabama wins the national title….now that ought to bring peace and prosperity, huh?

We should be so lucky….nope it is the last State of the Union (SOTU) for Obama……

Tonight’s big event will nothing but a victory lap for the prez….he will pat himself on the back and probably not give mush of an agenda for his last year in office….I mean why?  He will NEVER get anything like a real issue through our Congress….so why bother?

But if you must know what will be said tonight then maybe this will help…..I was going list the topics that I thought Obama might touch upon in his speech……..but screw it!  Read what The Hill has to say on it instead…….

Source: What to watch for in Obama’s last State of the Union address | TheHill

May I suggest that if you do not want to be bored to death for about an hour and then the follow-up speeches from other wannabes….then watch “My 600 Lb Life” or “Axe Men” or that spiky haired freak on the Food network…..

Me?  I have 3000 books….I will be fine….but thanx for asking.

Professor’s Class—Week 2…..Class 1

Took roll and found that they were all still attending…..a positive sign….there is one problem….a male student tries to inject religion into everything that is covered…..I feel that this will have to be shutdown unless it is relevant to the subject been covered……

Administered test….(lots of heavy sighs)……..gave students 30 minutes to complete….

Lecture began by telling class that we would be covering the time period of 1930 to 1945, the end of WW2……years between the two wars, the Interwar Years, the US was more pragmatic with the election of Harding and the auto was becoming an institution so US foreign policy was more concerned with the search for oil reserves that nations…..a short synopsis…..

After WWI, the US adopted a neutral stance towards the situation in Europe. As the country focused on returning to normal life during the prosperous 1920s, development of military technology was gradually put on the back burner. When the stock market crash of 1929 plunged the nation into a depression, some military programs were abandoned all together. During the 1930s, the last thing on the American mind was going to war again for Europe’s many political problems. As a result, the Americans were years behind their future adversaries like the Germans and Japanese, particularly in aircraft and armored vehicles. Even as the Japanese overtook parts of China and the Pacific islands and the Germans rolled through Poland, the American public was against going to war. It was not until the United States was attacked by the Japanese at Pearl Harbor and the Hitler declared war on the US in 1941 that the country was jolted into military production. Once the great industrial nation was awakened, the enormous output of machines and weapons would soon overwhelm the Axis powers, no matter how hard they fought.

During these years the main player in the foreign policy field was Wilson’s concept, the League of Nations……

Use hand out for the rest of the session…….

Source: Learn and talk about League of Nations mandate, 1920 establishments, 1946 disestablishments, Colonialism, French colonial empire

Keep in ind the rise of the Great Depression which began in 1929…..when the US foreign policy was centered around the loans to Germany to help them pay for WW1….During this period US oil companies were running around locating oil reserves especially in the new nation of Iraq…..

During this time the US attempted to make war impossible with the Kellogg-Briand Pact……(distribute hand-out)…..

Kellogg-Briand Pact, agreement, signed Aug. 27, 1928, condemning “recourse to war for the solution of international controversies.” It is more properly known as the Pact of Paris. In June, 1927, Aristide Briand, foreign minister of France, proposed to the U.S. government a treaty outlawing war between the two countries. Frank B. Kellogg, the U.S. Secretary of State, returned a proposal for a general pact against war, and after prolonged negotiations the Pact of Paris was signed by 15 nations—Australia, Belgium, Canada, Czechoslovakia, France, Germany, Great Britain, India, the Irish Free State, Italy, Japan, New Zealand, Poland, South Africa, and the United States. The contracting parties agreed that settlement of all conflicts, no matter of what origin or nature, that might arise among them should be sought only by pacific means and that war was to be renounced as an instrument of national policy. Although 62 nations ultimately ratified the pact, its effectiveness was vitiated by its failure to provide measures of enforcement. The Kellogg-Briand Pact was given an unenthusiastic reception by many countries. The U.S. Senate, ratifying the treaty with only one dissenting vote, still insisted that there must be no curtailment of America’s right of self-defense and that the United States was not compelled to take action against countries that broke the treaty. The pact never made a meaningful contribution to international order, although it was invoked in 1929 with some success, when China and the USSR reached a tense moment over possession of the Chinese Eastern RR in Manchuria. Ultimately, however, the pact proved to be meaningless, especially with the practice of waging undeclared wars in the 1930s (e.g., the Japanese invasion of Manchuria in 1931, the Italian invasion of Ethiopia in 1935, and the German occupation of Austria in 1938).

Source: The Kellogg-Briand Pact, 1928 – 1921–1936 – Milestones – Office of the Historian

Discussion of the events covered in class……

 

 

Cowards Are At It Again

I have been very vocal on what I think of our dynamite Congress…..personally I think they are lazy and just plain…cowards!

Back in the day when Obama made the decision to attack Syria, especially the ISIS controlled area….I said then that I thought it was an illegal act without the Congress in approval…..and surprised me many Repubs were saying the same thing……but that quickly died an inglorious death….why?  2016 election!

you see if they tried to force Obama’s hand on this issue they would appear to be weak and it was more important that they push it off the table than do what they originally said they would do….

To say that I have lost all respect for the institution would be an understatement…..but when I thought these toads could not get more cowardly…..I was mistaken……

Speaking today on ABC’s This Week, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R – KY) dismissed the efforts of House Speaker Paul Ryan (R – WI) to explore a possible Authorization of the Use of Military Force (AUMF) for the ongoing ISIS war, saying he didn’t see it as feasible.

McConnell went on to say he “couldn’t imagine” passing any AUMF in the Senate that President Obama would sign, saying any such authorization would “tie the hands of the next president” on the war, saying the next president will have to clean up the mess.

The War Powers Resolution of 1973 forbids the US from entering any armed conflict longer than 60 days without an explicit vote authorizing it from Congress. The ISIS war has been ongoing for over a year and a half with no such vote ever taking place.

Did you get that?  War Powers Resolution of 1973 forbids the US from entering any armed conflict……..without approval of Congress…..

How long is the ISIS been happening?  18 months more or less…..what happen to the Constitutionality of anything ?  Maybe I was right…..the Constitution is just nothing more than a political prop….

What say you?

The Deceptive Debate Over What Causes Terrorism Against the West

Since the War on Terror was called out I have been fascinated on the term…..I know it is semantics…..but terror is a weapon not an actually “army”…..watching the media with a rational eye will show people that there is a wealth of propaganda in most reports……my feeling is this is a war that cannot be won…..just lessened in some form or another…..

I read this article and wanted to press it so that my readers could see another side of the argument….if you will…..

Source: The Deceptive Debate Over What Causes Terrorism Against the West

Chest thumping is getting us nowhere…..it is all so much slogans and applause lines but no real tactics have emerged from all this bolstering….we can spend billions on top of billions and be no closer to a resolution to the problem….maybe it is time for the “leaders” to step back and take a hard look at the big picture….

Any thoughts?