Now Here Is An Idea!

Bobbi Eden

A porn star from the Netherlands named Bobbi Eden has promised oral sex for all of her Twitter followers if the Netherlands win the World Cup. Fun!

Eden’s number of followers has gone from just over 4,000 on Tuesday when she first made her courageous promise, to 66,163 as of right now.

Yes Irene there is a GOD!

The Life Of A “Claims Czar”

Inkwell Institute

Oil Spill Series

Look under any rock in Washington and you will find a “czar” of some sorts…..a czar is the cute name given to anyone that heads a program for the government….an education czar, auto bailout czar, intel czar….on and on…..you get the idea (i am a bit presumptuous here)…..but you will get it, eventually…..appointing a “czar” does NOTHING to solve the problem, more matter what the problem is…..

By now we all are aware of the problems in the Gulf and the clean-up that is in progress…..okay, BP owes a ton of cash for their ownership of the massive opil spill now in progress….how will we be sure that the bills are paid?  Obama has done what ALL recent presidents have done…….he appointed a czar….a “Claims Czar”…..

And his name forevermore will be known as Kenneth Feinberg……

But what do we know about the Decepticon known as Kenneth Feinberg?

Tom Eley has a good piece on the new czar……

The career of “claims czar” Kenneth Feinberg leaves little doubt that the escrow account set up by the Obama administration to compensate victims of BP’s Gulf of Mexico oil blowout will have as its overriding aim the defense of the oil giant’s profitability.

Feinberg’s task has been to present the image of objectivity and concern while pursuing the interests of the state and big corporations.

In a number of high-profile disputes since the 1980s, Feinberg has repeatedly proven himself a reliable “fixer” for the ruling class:

Agent Orange Product Liability Litigation

A class action lawsuit was gaining steam against Agent Orange’s manufacturers when Feinberg was brought in to resolve the case. Within six weeks, he had ended the eight-year-old lawsuit by establishing a $180 million fund, a small amount for Agent Orange’s producers, the chemical giants Dow and Monsanto. For his labors Feinberg was paid $800,000. Affected veterans were given $1,200 in exchange for disavowing their right to litigate.

The Dalkon Shield case

Feinberg was appointed Trustee of the victim compensation fund for Dalkon Shield, a notorious birth control device that manufacturer A. H. Robins sold in the 1970s in spite of evidence that it caused serious injury among women.

It was established that A. H. Robins knew of the dangers to women’s health, but suppressed the information, even destroying evidence. In 1985 A. H. Robins filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in order to protect itself from Dalkon Shield litigation. A trust fund was established, overseen by Feinberg, by which injured women forfeited their right to go to court and a cap was set on company liability.

While Feinberg’s trust gave most women $725 or less.

September 11th Victim Compensation Fund

Appointed by Bush administration Attorney General John Ashcroft, Feinberg’s assignment was only secondarily to limit damages to the federal government and the airlines. This time the primary purpose was political—to avoid lawsuits that might bring to light uncomfortable truths about the Bush administration’s role in the lead-up to the 9/11 attacks and what the preponderance of evidence suggests was an ordered stand down of the US military-intelligence apparatus.

Signing up for the fund meant that families would forgo the right to sue.

The list shows that if the people effected by the Gulf oil spill are expecting justice then they are sadly mislead.  All the twitter about every dime owed for the clean-up is just what I have said from day one…….hollow promise that will not ever see the light of day…..sorry to say……

People….People….People……SCOTUS let Exxon off the hook for the Valdez incident and if you think that BP will pay all that is owed then you are delusional!

What Is The End Game?

Inkwell Institute

International Studies Desk

That is the question that I have asked from the second year onward….and I am NOT alone….many people are starting to ask that very same question and so far, like me, have not had a good answer to the question……

We have heard that we are in Afghanistan to rid the world of al Qaeda but yet there are fewer than a 100 in the country….or we are there to keep the Taliban from regaining power and let the cycle begin again as it did in 1989 when the Russians vacated the country, but which Taliban?  There are many versions of the movement, some terror related and others just a local movement.  Or we are there to help stabilize a volatile part of the world….would that be a political solution?  In other words we are nation building?

The Congress has just voted on a funding project for Afghanistan…

The last two weeks have thrown an especially harsh light on the war effort, with new reports of corruption in President Hamid Karzai’s government, and a change in the commander of U.S. forces and multinational forces in Afghanistan.

The House-approved bill includes nearly $4 billion in economic aid to Afghanistan and its neighbor, Pakistan.

Still it seemed a wonder the new money for the unpopular war got through the House at all, after long arguments among Democratic lawmakers over whether and how to do it. They set up a complicated series of votes in which the non-military spending passed 239-182, while the part containing the war funding passed 215-210.

Just what is the end game for declaring a victory in Afghanistan and bringing the troops home?  Just what is the “real” reasons that we and our allies are still forcing our troops into such hardships?

If it is the AQ thing, then there are more within the borders of Pakistan than there are in Afghanistan….should not our focus be on Pakistan then?  That will NOT happen!

Okay then, is it the Taleban?  There are about as many Taleban organizations as hair on the back of your hand….some are hard core terrorists, some are just pissed that we are an occupying force and then there are those that are just fundamentalist religious types….which one of these are we fighting?  Is it the word Taleban that we are fighting?  Why not eliminate the hard core and then work with the others?

And then there is the “political” side of the reason for war……let us be honest…the popularly elected (a point of contention) president of Afghanistan, Karzai, is little more than the mayor of the capital, Kabul.

So what is the end game in Afghanistan?  Politicians cannot answer that simple question, then who has the answer?

Out Of Touch

From the VOMITORIUM

I hear some conserv pundits say, almost daily, that Repubs have ideas and have the will, just not the power to institute conserv ideals…..I will agree that there are some ideas coming from the GOP but most are recycled from the 80’s…just change the wording to make it sound new and fresh…..you know the stuff…tort reform, privatize Social Security,  cut the deficit, smaller government….yada yada yada…..

First of all, I would like to apologize to my conserv friends…I know it looks like I pick on the GOP way too much…but in reality they ask for it…..

The truth of the matter is that most conservs are old white guys that are out of touch with America….do not care what they call their latest proposal (Road Map For America’s Future…in case you were wondering)

GOP has NO new ideas for government or the economy…they are just re-hashes from the past or the fact that all the things that they are opposed to could have been addressed when they held the majority or their whining but others whining…..

I know,  if you are a conserv then you think I am being a “leftie” agitator…you would like more specifics….cool..I am down with that!

GOP candidate Angle  in Nevada thinks that you can eliminate unemployment by denying unemployment benefits to people out of work or,

GOP minority leader in the House, Boehner who compares the economic crisis to an ant or,

GOP Rand Paul who thinks that BP is being picked on and should be left alone or,

RNC chairman Michael Steele who thinks Obama started the war in Afghanistan…..

“The McChrystal incident, to me, was very comical. And I think it’s a reflection of the frustration that a lot of our military leaders have with this Administration and their prosecution of the war in Afghanistan,” said Steele. “Keep in mind again, federal candidates, this was a war of Obama’s choosing. This is not something the United States had actively prosecuted or wanted to engage in.”

And Steele is the chairman of the RNC…he is your spokesman!

Come Repubs admit it!  Your leadership and candidates are out of touch with the rest of the country…..how can you ask the people to vote for candidates that have no grasp of what it is to live in the real world?

Government By Management

Inkwell Institute

Subject:  Federalism/Governance/Management

Paper #21

Public policy is simply the programs that a government pursues…..I did say …”simply”.

Governmental policies should be properly managed and for the last 25 or more years they have not…..management has been replaced with control by private enterprises…the theory being that a well managed company can run the government more efficiently than anyone……I would say this is an erroneous belief considering the shape of the country and especially the public policy…..but for proper management there must be rationalism….and there is the key!

Yes, that is correct, I believe the key to good governmental management is rationalism….a rational government is a good government.  In my years in grad school I studied public policy and there are ways to actually approach government in a rational way……

Please forgive me but I am working on this with an “old” brain and I may have a lapse or two of memory…..if government is rational then it will also be efficient and is that not what we all are looking for in our government?

To approach public policy in a rational way, there a a few things that must be followed…..I am talking about our reps as well as our presidential staff….everyone involved must have a rational perspective……but what makes a rational public policy?

There are a few things that policy makers must take into account for any policy to be rational….

1–know what is important in society and weigh their impact

2–know ALL policy alternatives that may be available.

3–know the consequences of all policies and their alternatives.

4–select the most efficient policy

5–go for it

Above are simple things that can make government good and efficient….but it takes accurate information, not the lame promises that have NO validity once they start to govern…….in other words prepare public policy from information not slogans.

Take the last big election for “change”……..and what did we get incrementalism.  In other words, we got NO change, just a continuation of the past government with a few minor revisions.

Now look at Obama’s public policy…….is it efficient or for that matter….rational?

Thomas Paine, The Father Of The U.S.of A.

Professor’s Classroom

Subject:  American History

Today we celebrate the signing of the Declaration of Independence and the birth of the United States of America….there is only one person that we should thank for the DoI as well as the name of this country…Thomas Paine.

Why would anyone make such a claim?  That is an easy one to answer…Thomas Paine was the FIRST person to envision a United States of America.  There were many signers and orators of the time, but only one man can truly be called the Father of the United States of America.

As I have said he was the first person to use the term United States of America, he made the idea more palatable to the average colonialists.  And in doing so made the Revolution possible for without his input through his pamphlet , “Common Sense” the revolution would have failed for the only ones that really wanted a break from Mother England was the wealthy and the elites of the time.

His influence was felt on other issues of the day and some of them were not that popular with the elites, especially the ones on slavery, women and the poor.

He proposed the Abolition of Negro Slavery; proposed Arbitration for International Peace; advocated Justice for Women; pointed out the Reality of Human Brotherhood; suggested International Copyright; invented a suspension bridge and smokeless candle; proposed the Education of Children of the Poor at public expense; suggested a Great Republic of All Nations of the world.  He urged the Purchase of the great Louisiana Territory.  He proposed pension payments or Old Age Pensions.  He also suggested protection for dumb animals.  We have honored him when we have adopted these sane propositions.

But let us be honest, before the arrival of Thomas Paine, reconciliation with England was the rule of the day.  There was little thought of independence in those days, but rather to gain some sort of recognition from the English crown.  Even the hero of every American, Thomas Jefferson, was hesitant to call for separation from England.

He even wrote it in a letter to John Randolph in 1775:

“Believe me , dear sir, there is not in the British Empire a man who more cordially loves a union with Great Britain more than I…..It is neither our wish or our interest to separate from her (England).  ……Let them name their terms and let them be just….”

This was written to the person a mere two months before the publishing of Common Sense.  Jefferson became a convert to the independence thing after seeing and hearing the impact of the writings of Thomas Paine.  Independence in Jefferson’s mind was the worst possible solution to the problems the colonies were having with Mother England.

And everybody’s first American hero, George Washington was not an independence minded person….in a letter to his friend, Jonathan Boucher on the possibility of conflict with England:

If you ever hear of my joining any such measures, you have my leave to set me down for everything wicked.

Almost nowhere in the Colonies was there a call for independence from England until Paine published “Common Sense” and after the “Founding Fathers” saw the impact it had on the population, did they become a convert to the thought of independence.

Then when the Continental Army was in retreat and dangerously close to collapse Washington asked Paine to use his skills as a writer to help raise support and moral….once again Paine came to the rescue and wrote a series of pamphlets which would later be known as “The Crisis”.  (BTW, United States of America was used for the first time in “The Crisis, essay 2”)   With the publication of the series, new life was pumped into the movement and the army.

And yes, I will always trumpet the issues in Thomas Paine’s honor……why?….for one I think that he was the person that originated the Declaration of Independence (DoI).  Jefferson may have wrote it but the ideas were Paine’s and not Jefferson and the bunch.  Think I am wrong?  Read Common Sense and then read the DoI…the original version, for the final version was only about 75% of the original….the DoI is a condensed version of Common Sense.  Jefferson was a pragmatist not an idealist….Jefferson lacked the passion of an idealist, as a matter of fact, during the time when the people we lathering up for independence Jefferson did NOT write a thing either in favor of independence or in opposition…the pragmatic thing to do would have tried to force England into conciliation with the colonies.  That idea NEVER entered Paine’s mind, he was for independence first and foremost.

If anyone deserves the title father of this country, then it should be Thomas Paine.  Unfortunately, Washington had been saddled with that title because he was the general that lead American rag tag forces to victory.  History tries to avoid the fact that it was Paine that urged the Continental Congress to appoint Washington as the commanding general of the army, when others were in the running.  So the “historical” father of the country owes his station and his legacy to Paine and in no small way.

Thomas Paine is the father of the United States of America, because it was his IDEA that lead to the independence from the British Empire….who knows where the US would be today if it had not been for that idea.  The best we have ever done for this man was a stamp with his likeness….he deserves more recognition than that….more truth needs to be taught to our children about the REAL history of the beginning of this country.  When a short history of the “Founding Fathers” is taught, the Big 6 are usually taught, Washington, Jefferson, Hamilton, Adams, John not Samuel, Madison and Franklin..others are left out of the lesson…that should be rectified and then maybe Paine would take his rightful place as the original “Founding Father”.





Declaration Of Independence

Professor’s Classroom

It is the day before the 4th and there are things about the founding that I have written about on numerous occasions….and this subject is one that I have researched and researched and I am convinced that Jefferson worked from notes on the DofI……

This is a re-print from the Hammondsport Herald from July, 1906 written by Walton Williams……..

Did Thomas Paine write the Declaration Of Independence?

Ever since the Revolution there has been a tradition in certain parts of the country that the real author of the Declaration of Independence was Thomas Paine. The storm of opprobrium that beat upon Paine’s name because of his religious writings almost eradicated this tradition.

But now that there is a marked tendency to do justice to his unquestioned services to liberty, the legend has revived. It should be said in the outset that with the religious controversy concerning Paine this article has nothing to do. His writing on that subject did not appear till near the end of is life. All the most active years of his manhood were spent in the domain of politics, and the political works of which he was the author are much more numerous and voluminous than those on theology. It is beyond question that he wrought powerfully for the rights of man not only in America, but in France and England; that he risked imprisonment and even life in doing so and that the American sense of justice and fair play can be trusted to give recognition to these services on their own merit.

Passing all that by, the inquiry into the authorship of the Declaration of Independence is of sufficient interest to warrant a dispassionate investigation. Reverting to the tradition connecting Paine with that document, it is a significant fact that a newspaper of Newark, N. J., nearly a century ago threatened to divulge the name of the real author of the Declaration and there stated that he was a well known writer and used other terms in describing him that could have referred to no one else than Paine. A further fact of interest is that the friendship between Paine and Jefferson continued unbroken to the end, Jefferson sending a warship to bring Paine to this country. Another fact that may have some bearing on the matter is that Jefferson never claimed to be the author of the document until near the end of his life, which was years after Paine’s death, and even then in slightly ambiguous terms, which are capable of an interpretation that will be brought out later.

The evidence on which the claim of Paine’s authorship rests is internal, however, and must be found in the document itself. Several pamphlets and books have been written on the subject in the last thirty years. Prominent among those who had supported the Paine theory may be mentioned William Henry Burr and Van Buren Denslow, students and authors of recognized ability.

In the first draft of the Declaration occurred the words, “Scotch and foreign mercenaries.” This offended some members of the Continental Congress of Scotch extraction, and they objected so strongly that the words “Scotch and” were stricken out. Now, Jefferson not only had no antipathy against the Scotch, but was rather prejudiced in their favor, having had two Scotch tutors, so that he could scarcely have written a clause so reflecting on them, but Paine was known to dislike the Scotch, having expressed that dislike in his writings and private conversations. Nor is this the only or even the most conclusive evidence connected with this passage. Jefferson in later years in writing of it showed that he was not sufficiently familiar with this first draft of the Declaration to quote it correctly, for he gave it, “Scotch and other foreign auxiliaries.” Is it probable if he had been the author of it that he would have made the mistake of injecting the word “other” and misquoting “auxiliaries” for “mercenaries?” The very injection of “other” is significant, for Jefferson, having been born in Virginia, would naturally look on the Scotch as foreign and would therefore say “Scotch and other foreign,” etc., but the author of that passage in the original Declaration evidently had another viewpoint, for he said “Scotch and foreign mercenaries,” indicating that he did not think of the Scotch as foreigners. Now, Paine was an Englishman, and whatever his prejudice against the Scotch might have been, a prejudice somewhat common among Englishmen of that day, he would not regard them as foreigners, Scotland and England being united in a common government.

Another passage in the original Declaration of Independence censured King George for introducing the slave trade into the colonies, asserting that this traffic, which had been the reproach of “infidel” countries, was thus condoned by “a Christian king.” This passage was likewise expurgated by Congress, as it gave offense to some of the southern members. Now, while Jefferson in later life deplored the existence of slavery, it is hardly possible that at this time he would have injected such language into a state paper. Nor is it likely that he would have made the veiled thrust at Christianity contained in the sarcastic reference to “a Christian king.” That was not Jefferson’s style. But it was Paine’s style. Also the sentiments are his. Already in the Pennsylvania Magazine he had written against slavery. Jefferson, notwithstanding his advanced notions, was not without policy, and there is no policy in this paragraph. But Paine spoke his mind regardless of policy.

One of the most surprising things about the Declaration of Independence is that it makes but slight reference to the subject of taxation, despite the fact that the first troubles between the colonists and the mother country had been over the stamp act and “no taxation without representation” had become the American rallying cry. Jefferson had no peculiar bias that would have caused him to make so notable an omission, but Paine had. He regarded the taxation issue as trivial and as being too mercenary to be worthy of so much attention. These sentiments are freely expressed in his writings. Liberty and independence were the great shibboleths with him, and these are always the keynotes sounded in the Declaration. Moreover, the ideas throughout the document are those of Paine. His ideas of government, as embodied in his “Common Sense,” ideas which were then considered peculiar, are found in the Declaration of Independence. His theories as to equality, as to the rights of man and as to the right of rebellion not only in this particular instance, but generally, are all stated in that instrument. Not only so, but the methods of expression are startlingly like those in his published works. The style is not the scholarly, easy and pleasing one of Jefferson, but the terse, epigrammatic, forceful one of Paine.

The manner of piling up the indictments against the king, charge upon charge, until they became a very mountain of evidence, is the well known method of Paine, not that of Jefferson. The employment of certain words in peculiar ways, such as “decent,” “equal,” “rights,” “happiness” and many more found in the document, is significant, for these were stock words with Paine, and he used them in just the ways they were used here. The reference to “nature and nature’s God” is in perfect keeping with Paine’s well known deistical notions and startlingly calls to mind his eloquent apostrophe to the revelation of God found in nature. There are three references to the Creator in the Declaration, and they are all very like Paine, who thoroughout his political works is constantly making similar utterances. Jefferson, while a deist also, hardly ever makes a mention of God in his political writings.

Most of the above considerations are urged by Denslow and Burr, but there is one little piece of evidence that seemingly has escaped these authors which to the writer seems the most conclusive of all. It is the use of the word, “hath,” which occurs in the preamble of the document. Scholarly Jefferson in all his writing is never known to have employed this archaic verb ending, while Thomas Paine used it frequently and in just such a connection as it is found in here. That may seem a small thing, but it is just such a clew as a detective selects to work out a case. It is like the bone of a prehistoric monster from which the scientist constructs the entire skeleton.

The most probable theory of the writing of this most famous of political manifestoes is as follows: After the publication of Common Sense, which had fired the colonies for separation, Paine urged the step in season and out of season. What more natural than that he should have framed a paper that could be adopted by Congress as its reasons for independence? After writing such paper he would naturally read it to some of his cronies. Two of his most familiar friends were Jefferson and Franklin. When these two were appointed on the committee, what more probable than that they should have gone to Paine to get the draft. Using this as a basis, Jefferson could have written the copy presented to Congress. Some words he would doubtless change. Probably he would frame introductory and closing sentences. This theory would be in keeping with Jefferson’s own utterances on the subject. It was years after that he made the first reference to the matter. Then he only said: “The committee for drawing the Declaration of Independence desired me to do it. It was accordingly done, and, being approved by them I reported it to the House on Friday, the 28th of June.” It was not till just before his death that he said, “I wrote it.” In a manual sense that was doubtless true. The opening and closing sentences and certain alterations he may have actually originated, but as to the main body of the document it can be said as it was said of old: “The hand is the hand of Esau, but the voice is the voice of Jacob.” The hand is the hand of Jefferson, but the voice is the voice of Thomas Paine.

The fact that Paine never claimed the authorship is in perfect keeping with his character. He was ever a most secretive man. Most of his works at this stage in his career were anonymous. Common Sense was published anonymously, and The Crisis practically so. His contributions to the Pennsylvania Magazine were signed by fictitious names and initials. Many letters he is known to have written and others that are believed to be his he never acknowledged to the time of his death.

Moreover, to have made this claim in relation to the Declaration of Independence would have embarrassed his friend, Jefferson, which, both for personal and political reasons, he would have been unwilling to do.

Comment:  Anyone that has read my stuff on this subject will know that I believe he did and that Jefferson put it down off of notes…..Jefferson, IMO, was a pragmatist not an idealist and was not capable of such an idealistic piece of work………

Spies To The Left……

From the desk of the Scriptorium

Have you seen the hottie that is being accused of spying for Russia?  Of course you have.  Come on…let’s be honest…..she could get your ATM pin number without much effort…..that is okay, I would be smiling as I called my bank to change the number….I like red heads!

Sorry about that….I just had to digress for a moment….

The Economist is reporting:

According to the documents provided by the FBI to the courts, the suspects were “illegal” agents of the Russian Foreign Intelligence agency (SVR), a descendant of the KGB, who had mostly lived in “deep cover” since the 1990s in sleepy suburbs of New York, Boston and Washington, DC.

In fact, the spies were not even successful enough to have espionage charges brought against them. Their task, it seems, was to infiltrate influential political circles in America and find out their thinking on Russia and Barack Obama’s intentions for last year’s summit in Moscow, but there is no sign that they succeeded beyond what could have been gleaned from reading the better papers. (One of the alleged moles, Vicky Pelaez, was, in fact, a left-leaning columnist for El Diario, New York’s largest Spanish language newspaper.)

By now the whole country is talking and even laughing at the Russian spies now in US custody…..yes, I said laughing…why?  Some think that they were just silly exercising some lame Cold War tactic that could not have gleamed much intel at all….

The media is STUPID!  They were doing what “real” spies do…..in the days before the emphasis on the techno geek side of intel gathering….a spy went into the culture and society to pin point people that could be used to gather the intel for them….people with lavish lifestyles or vulnerable in other ways…..these people were doing what spies use to do…..work on the ground building relationships and NOT staring at some monitor at Langley…..

All I am saying is that it is great to see spies working like spies and not some techno geek that only speaks computer-ese….okay, technology is a wonderful thing, but like in war….you cannot win without troops on the ground….and so it is with espionage…..

So, You Thought You Had Heard It All?

From the VOMITORIUM

You thought you heard some weird sh*t during the health reform debate…..just wait it gets better….

This would be tragic if it were not so godd*mn funny…..

First, I will give a little history lesson….on 30 August 2005, Hurricane Katrina kicked the shit out of the Mississippi Gulf Coast…and then during the clean up and repair, on 26 December 2005, I was thrown from a ladder onto concrete and broke my right leg in 5 places….and until recently I have been under the care of Worker’s Comp…after 2 operations and a piece of metal the size of Rhode Island…I still have pain issues and have been under the care of a pain management doctor for about a year…in this past month I have settled with the insurance company and now I am on my own…as far as the medical care goes……I have too much for Medicaid and not old enough for Medicare….and I am a high risk patient to other insurance companies……why?  Pre-existing condition…remember that from the past health reform debate?

I tell you a bit of my life to set the stage for this piece of news…..today I went for my appointment with pain management as a private citizen that will be footing the bill on my own dime….I will be paying the doctor and the medication out of my own money….cool right?

After my session with the doctor, I was told that I would need to get some sort of insurance if my doctor was going to continue to treat me…that they do NOT accept self-pay patients.  I was aghast!  Why I asked?  He said that the possibility the an addict would come in pop down the cash and get scripts for drugs was high.  I understand that he is trying to protect himself from future lawsuits…but what the Hell?  He said to treat me properly he needs to have some other tests run on me, like a psych eval and others, to be sure that I am not some sort of addict or pusher in hiding…….WTF?

Just how f*cked up is American health care when you cannot pay cash for services?

I mean come on….are you trying to tell me that you do not accept cash?  Hit it on the head, bubba!  So now I must search for an insurance company that will cover me for my medical needs…Good luck with that, Chuq-ie boy!

Scott Brown–New Style Politician

From the VOMITORIUM

Remember the day the Scott Brown won the special election in Massachusetts to replace the dead Sen. Kennedy?  He was the Tea Party candidate that was gonna change Washington….he was this new style politician….a true moderate that would do what he promised and in turn would change the way business was being done in Washington….

The media was all a flutter with his election to the Senate, especially the conservatives on the air….he was a new God to be worshiped because he bucked the system and won the election……

That was then…this is now!

When Massachusetts Republican Scott Brown addressed supporters after his upset victory in January, he declared there would be “no more closed-door meetings or back-room deals by an out-of-touch party leadership.”

After private talks with Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, Senate Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd and other top Democrats, Brown scored a series of exemptions from the “Volcker rule” — which would bar certain forms of proprietary trading — a provision pushed by big Massachusetts banks and financial firms, including State Street Corp. and Mass Mutual.Brown insists the changes he sought that would benefit Massachusetts firms were also national in scope, so they would not amount to a carve-out for a special interest back home.

More than a few of his colleagues grumbled at the freshman Republican’s outsize influence over the final stages of the financial reform talks. And several suggested that Brown’s deal making wasn’t very different from what Republicans had lampooned during the health care debate.

A new style politician?  Kinda smells like the same fecal matter that is ALWAYS present in Washington….there you go……change you can believe in….and you were easy enough to believe the crap….happy now?
I have yet to hear the media cover this….that would mean that they would have to admit that they were WRONG…..about Brown and his politics…..and about the vague promise of change…..