Almost daily there is some sort of gun violence all across this nation….in my area it is about every three days there is a shooting….some idiot attacks a school, a religious building, a protesting group or just for the Hell of it….and it is reported but it seems everyone looks elsewhere and could care less….so those ‘thoughts and prayers’ are about as useful as tits on a boar…..basically that is just saying ‘go f**k yourself’…..
With the recent death of a Right wing blowhard and the way they are deifying him there would be more concern for these twats on the direction of the gun situation….but apparently even the blowhard’s death does not change their mind on what needs to be done.
Donny’s AG, Blondi, may have the authority to change some of the laws….
The Attorney General has proposed regulations for procedures for persons to apply for removal of federal firearm disabilities. Most disabilities are found in 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). Under § 925(c), a person prohibited from firearm possession may petition for relief from federal disabilities by applying to the Attorney General, who “may grant such relief if it is established to his satisfaction that the circumstances regarding the disability, and the applicant’s record and reputation, are such that the applicant will not be likely to act in a manner dangerous to public safety and that the granting of the relief would not be contrary to the public interest.”
In my view, overall the proposed regulations are fair and reasonably implement the above statutory provision. However, there are two items that should be eliminated or modified. Both provide that applications will be denied, absent extraordinary circumstances, if the applicant has been convicted of two types of offenses. Those convictions should be considered on a case-by-case basis instead of being subject to presumptive denial.
https://reason.com/volokh/2025/10/01/second-amendment-roundup-removal-of-firearm-disabilities/
Then there is SCOTUS….
With the uptick in mass shootings SCOTUS has the opportunity to make it worse…..
The Supreme Court agreed Friday to decide if states may bar people from carrying guns on private property without permission from the property owner, wading into a thorny Second Amendment dispute that could expand carry rights in malls, restaurants and stores.
It is the first major Second Amendment case the 6-3 conservative court has agreed to hear in more than a year. In recent years the court has decided a number of high-profile Second Amendment cases in ways that have expanded access to guns.
The appeals court was “absolutely right to say it’s constitutional to prohibit guns on private property unless the owner says they want guns there,” said Janet Carter, managing director of Second Amendment litigation at Everytown Law. “This law respects people’s right to be safe on their own property, and we urge the Supreme Court to uphold it.”
Previously, the state’s law allowed someone with a permit to carry their handgun into a store, for instance, unless the property owner explicitly prohibited it. The new law flipped that around and required unambiguous written or verbal authorization. The law also barred the carrying of guns on beaches and in parks as well as bars and restaurants that serve alcohol.
https://www.cnn.com/2025/10/03/politics/supreme-court-guns-hawaii-second-amendment
Just what this country needs…..more guns in crowded venues…..who comes up with this shite?
Would anyone care to venture a guess on how those political hacks at SCOTUS will vote?
I Read, I Write, You Know
“lego erg scribo”