A Middle East NATO?

WE here in the West have NATO as an armed wing of foreign policy….basically it was a group started to help Europe deal with Soviet expansion during the Cold War….

We all know simplistically the problems in the Middle East…..could their problems be handled by a version of NATO especially designed for the countries in the Middle East?

But I thought that they had an organization along these lines….it is called The Arab League….

According to its charter, the founding members of the Arab League (Egypt, Syria, Transjordan, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, and Yemen) agreed to seek “close cooperation” on matters of economics, communication, culture, nationality, social welfare, and health. They renounced violence for the settlement of conflicts between members and empowered League offices to mediate in such disputes, as well as in those with non-members. Signatories agreed to collaborate in military affairs; this accord was strengthened with a 1950 pact committing members to treat acts of aggression on any member state as an act against all.

There is a proposal making its way around the region and of course it was the Saudis that pitched the idea originally…..

The year was 2015……..

A new Saudi-led Islamic alliance to fight terrorism will share information and train, equip and provide forces if necessary for the fight against Islamic State militants, Saudi Foreign Minister Adel al-Jubeir said on Tuesday.

Saudi Arabia announced earlier on Tuesday the formation of a 34-nation Islamic military coalition to combat terrorism, a move welcomed by the United States which has been urging a greater regional involvement in the campaign against the militants who control swathes of territory in Iraq and Syria.

Source: Saudi Arabia announces 34-state Islamic military alliance against terrorism | Reuters

The alliance’s full roster is Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Qatar, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Jordan, Tunisia, Yemen, the Palestinians, Egypt, Morocco, Turkey, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Malaysia, Benin, Chad, Togo, Djibouti, Senegal, Sudan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Gabon, Guinea, Comoros, Ivory Coast, Maldives, Mali, Mauritania, Niger and Nigeria.

I find it interesting that the nation that introduced Muslims to the idea of “jihad” originated in Saudi Arabia….the country that has cut off as many heads as ISIS, a country that has a religious police, a country that does not allow women to drive, and  well you get the idea.

I bring all this up again because of what the Saudis have just done…..An international public relations firm is facing accusations of complicity in “whitewashing” alleged Saudi Arabian war crimes in Yemen after signing a deal to represent a Riyadh-dominated military alliance dubbed the “Muslim Nato”.

Source: Saudis hire world’s biggest PR firm to push ‘Muslim Nato’ | Middle East Eye

Is this organization about fighting terrorism or is it more about popularity of the originator?

Personally, I like the idea of a Middle East “NATO”….but not when one of the world’s biggest violators of human rights is the leader.

Why not incorporate this idea into the idea of The Arab League?

This does not past the sniff test for me.

Any thoughts?

Advertisements

8 thoughts on “A Middle East NATO?

  1. Well, NATO is a joint defense organization… which also serves as a kind of deterant to nuclear proliferation within developing and Third World nations. For a while there was SEATO.. Southeast Asia Treaty Organization.. that went until the 1980’s, I believe. This Arab thing doesn’t have that flavor at all. It seems more a joint cooperation to fight terrorism than any joint defense treaty. It’s like, who would the Arab League be having a joint defense treaty against? Much of the Middle East Arab countries were simply tribes that just got lucky when the Brits and the western powers gave them political borders; former busting up of Persia and the Ottoman Empire. When Saddam invaded Kuwait it took some convincing before the Saudis signed on, and the other countries barely helped kick Saddam out at all. So.. there’s nothing “NATO” about the Arab League.

    1. The Arab League can do as much as any new effort…why waste the time when there is already a provision within the League’s charter for such an organization….the Saudis are looking for control not protection. chuq

  2. Maybe the Saudis in control is not a bad idea. Someone needs to control the Middle East cause nobody from the West can do it… not that we even should. But because there are so many factions over there, and Islamic interpretations, the Saudis will likely never have control either.

    1. The Saudis are the ones that brought about the “jihad” thing…..they are too religious for them to be in control of the region…bad enough they have one country….chuq

  3. Grin – I am interested in how Navajo talk together about their future and not so much about what I and other non-Navajo think what is best for Navajo… grin.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s