Just like the days of old in the USSR where one party lead and everyone must endure…..the US is moving in that direction with gerrymandering and with the help of SCOTUS……the GOP has been working on this for decades and they are now close to realizing their desires.
They have gotten one step closer thanks in part for SCOTUS…..
The Supreme Court is set to hear Louisiana v. Callais for a second time in 2025, a case that could gut the landmark Voting Rights Act of 1965 and alter the balance of political power in America into a “one-party system.” At issue is whether Section 2 of the act — which prohibits racial discrimination in voting — violates the Constitution by allowing race to be considered in redistricting.
If the conservative supermajority strikes down Section 2 or weakens it significantly, experts warn it would devastate minority political power, especially among Black voters, and cement Republican control of Congress. “This is opening a whole new front from Republicans’ point of view, where they can dilute Black political power and achieve an unbelievable power grab,” said Lauren Groh-Wargo, CEO of Fair Fight Action, a liberal voting rights group. “Doing so would ‘clear the path for a one-party system where power serves the powerful and silences the people,” Black Voters Matter Fund co-founder LaTosha Brown said in a statement.
The case arose after Louisiana’s legislature was ordered by a lower court to draw a second Black-majority district to comply with the Voting Rights Act. A group of white residents sued, claiming the change discriminated against them. The Supreme Court’s reargument centers on whether Section 2 itself is unconstitutional under the 14th and 15th Amendments. Louisiana has since reversed its stance — once supporting the Black voters’ claim but now arguing that Section 2 should be struck down. In a surprising shift, the Department of Justice also joined the case, taking a position against the act for the first time in history.
https://knewz.com/supreme-court-ruling-clears-path-one-party-system/
The fruits of their labors are at hand.
Personally I have said for years that we already have a one party system just a couple of factions within that party…..we have a conservative party plain and simple.
Seems extreme right?
Well maybe so but I am not alone….
Christopher Hitchens was right.
Well, perhaps to some, that first statement by itself is too provocative. Allow me to specify: Christopher Hitchens was right as it relates to third parties. Namely that third parties are, by definition, bound to fail, for America is still awaiting the creation of a second party.
Over the last 20 to 30 years, if one removed the dates from most bills passed in Congress, I believe one would be unable to tell exactly which president signed said bill into law. The administrations were simply too similar.
Yet in the midst of a culture that privileges party politics and in a population that seems to be disagreeable, partisan, and divided, what exactly are we all against?
…
Of course, these parties publicly do not agree on the hot-topic issues. But on other important issues such as the regulation of Wall Street, U.S. interference in foreign countries, or in-depth debates on economic theory, there is no Republican Party and Democratic Party; there is only one party.
Take, for example, foreign policy. One must ask if the policies of President Obama were any different from the policies of President George W. Bush. Rationally, the engagements in the Middle East under the Bush administration and the engagements led by President Obama in Syria and Libya were virtually indistinguishable. There is simply one-party rule.
Read On
Opinion: The United States has only one party
Donny and the thugs will eliminate the factions and all bow down to the one.
I still say we do not need political parties….the country would be better off without them.
But Donny’s actions look suspiciously like socialism….(please read before you attack)
Recently, a handful of people—none of whom have ever invited me to their birthday party—accused President Donald Trump of being a socialist. Gavin Newsom, who many pundits credibly believe is the governor of California, said Trump is committing socialism by having the federal government buy stock in private companies.
At the time of writing, the government has taken shares in Intel, MP Materials, Lithium Americas, U.S. Steel, and even a Canadian mining company that mines cobalt or some other stupid mineral I hate. This raises the question:
Is Trump, as Newsom contends, a full-blown socialist? Or is he just an asymptomatic carrier of socialism, like I am with tuberculosis?
Let’s nail down what we’re talking about.
In socialism, the government owns the means of production. Instead of private companies making goods to satisfy customers and turn a profit, the state produces things to hit output quotas. That’s a lot easier to do if you cut quality. The Soviet Union literally made televisions so poorly that they sometimes exploded. Not a great incentive structure for generating stuff, even if an exploding television is still an improvement over The View.
https://reason.com/2025/11/07/is-trump-a-socialist/
WE know from his ramblings that he hates socialism….but does he?
“America will never be a socialist country!” says President Donald Trump.
I hope not.
Trump rightly declared socialism “the wrecker of nations and destroyer of societies.”
But I fear he’s confused about what socialism is.
“Trump says he’s against socialism, but he is having the government get involved in owning companies and directing companies,” complains economist Daniel Mitchell in my new video.
When Trump took 10 percent of Intel, his commerce secretary, Howard Lutnick, said, “It’s not socialism. This is capitalism!”
But when government takes partial ownership of companies, that is socialism.
I said to Mitchell, “It’s just 10 percent.”
“It doesn’t have to be 100 percent,” he replies. “If you’re Intel, there’s no way you’re going to antagonize the Trump administration or some future AOC administration by doing something that the government doesn’t like.”
Even Trump worries about that, saying, “I’m a little concerned whoever that president might be.”
“I don’t trust Donald Trump to control the share correctly,” says Mitchell, “but I definitely don’t trust some of the folks on the left. All of a sudden, you’ve created this precedent of government being a senior partner sitting in the boardroom.…It’s going to be a disaster for the U.S. economy.”
https://reason.com/2025/11/12/trump-says-he-hates-socialism-so-why-is-he-acting-like-a-socialist/
Just saying is all.
Thoughts?
I Read, I Write, You Know
“lego ergo scrbo”