With the mildly successful voting in the past election the Dems seem to have found their political legs to defeat the Donny machine….or have they?
They were successful in NYC, Virginia and New Jersey but will that translate to the mid-terms?
Many people are delighted at the voting outcome….but will it translate?
To answer my question….past track record suggest they probably have not.
History is not on their side….
Democrats enabled Donald Trump to become president twice because of repetition compulsions that still propel the party’s leaders – undermining the party’s potential to end the real-life nightmare of Maga control over the federal government. Scrutinizing how this century’s Democratic leaders set the stage for Trump’s electoral triumphs is crucial not only for clarity about the past. It also makes possible a vital focus on how such failures can be avoided in the future.
Elites did quite well after Barack Obama took back the presidency for Democrats in January 2009, amid the Great Recession. He bailed out big banks while a huge number of people lost their homes. By the time Obama was most of the way through his presidency, he had facilitated “the dispossession of at least 5.2 million US homeowner families, the explosion of inequality, and the largest ruination of middle-class wealth in nearly a century”, the journalist David Dayen pointed out.
Obama’s last year as president was supposed to lead to Hillary Clinton’s first. She was the party establishment’s favorite. “You know, I get accused of being kind of moderate and center,” Clinton told a Women for Hillary audience in 2015. “I plead guilty.” The Democratic National Committee and corporate media provided major assists as she withstood the strong progressive campaign of Bernie Sanders. But after winning the nomination, Clinton never got traction with younger voters, who had gone overwhelmingly for Sanders during the primaries.
After Trump defeated Clinton in November 2016, Democratic party leaders could hardly blame themselves or their “moderate and center” nominee. Criticizing her coziness with Wall Street wouldn’t do. Neither would critiquing her thinly veiled contempt for the progressive wing of the party. Instead, the swift response from prominent Clinton campaigners was to blame Russia, launching a prolonged fixation on “Russiagate” that let the corporate-friendly leaders of the party off the hook.
The party leadership’s devotion to economic elites continued to evade scrutiny. As Sanders told a reporter in 2017: “Certainly there are some people in the Democratic party who want to maintain the status quo. They would rather go down with the Titanic so long as they have first-class seats.”
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/nov/02/trump-democrats-playbook
There is the rub.
The status quo.
The party that Clinton built is addicted to corporate cash and that is not changing.
I am pleased that Donny took it in the shorts but I am not confident that the Dems will learn any electoral lessons from this win.
I believe they will slink back into the arms of the corporations and their money.
This country deserves better from a political party that is no better than the party they just defeated.
Any thoughts?
I Read, I Write, You Know
“lego ergo scribo”