In the days of my studies of international relations I studied the technique of a Dr. Bueno de Mesquita….he designed an algorithm that can be used to predict international events……he was tested by the CIA and others and his technique was about 90% accurate consistently…human prediction was a 50-50 at best.
I found it fascinating that an algorithm could be employed with such accuracy…..and now it appears that the US is trying this technique to try and predict the possibility of attack from ISIS…….
A new mathematical model aims to track the activity of Islamic State sympathizers online and determine when groups will turn from talk to action.
After Orlando and San Bernardino and Paris, there is new urgency to understand the signs that can precede acts of terrorism. And with the Islamic State’s prolific use of social media, terrorism experts and government agencies continually search for clues in posts and Twitter messages that appear to promote the militants’ cause.
A physicist may not seem like an obvious person to study such activity. But for months, Neil Johnson, a physicist at the University of Miami, led a team that created a mathematical model to sift order from the chaotic pro-terrorism online universe.
Source: Fighting ISIS With an Algorithm, Physicists Try to Predict Attacks – The New York Times
Some may find this a bit mundane and dry….but it is a new field that does show some possibilities…..if it can be as helpful as the algorithm of Dr, de Mesquita then there could be a major break through in the fight against ISIS.
You’re right chuq, it is fascinating but I’m going to have to take a 2nd run at the article. ~~dru~~
Let me know if there is anything I can do to help….chuq
The subject of predicting human interaction as a society was explored pretty thoroughly by Isaac Asimov in his Foundation series of books. One protagonist, Harry Sedlon, developed just such an algorithm, only Asimov made it an entire branch of mathematics, which he used to predict the future of human society. Pretty fascinating set of books, looking at the issue from a number of directions…
The final upshot was, it can’t be done with any real expectation of accuracy, for humans don’t obey the laws of mathematics…. not any we’ve been able to identify, anyway. We are just too random in our decision making process; too many variables to be able to predict with any degree of confidence….
So, I wish them luck, for it is indeed a magic bullet they seek….
gigoid, the dubious
That should be Harry Seldon, not Sedlon….
gigoid
Check out Dr. de Mesquita……it is an interesting subject chuq