Bloomberg And Foreign Policy

For me the most important issue for a candidate is their foreign policy stands……Bloomberg has only been a candidate for a couple of weeks and the media has helped him shoot up in the polls to 5% without having to do the hard work to get there…..he has bought the support.  (Who says money does not matter?)

He has qualifications…..he is rich that is number one…..but what is his foreign policy stands?

Now that Mike Bloomberg has made his vanity presidential campaign official, it is worth reviewing his foreign policy record to understand why he is such a terrible candidate. Mehdi Hasan reminds us that Bloomberg was a conventional hawkish Republican until not that long ago, and his foreign policy views haven’t noticeably improved since he left the GOP:

Bloomberg, though, has been an abject failure on each of these issues. Take the war in Iraq. The then-Republican mayor of New York not only backed the illegal invasion and occupation in March 2003, but he also supported perhaps the most egregiously dishonest and bizarre justification for the war: that Saddam Hussein was involved in the 9/11 attacks. This, of course, was a brazen lie told by the likes of Dick Cheney and Fox News. But it was also publicly endorsed by Bloomberg.

I mentioned Bloomberg’s disgraceful propagandizing on behalf of Bush and the Iraq war in an earlier post, and this was just the most memorable part of his poor record. It isn’t surprising that someone who presents himself as a “centrist” should hold such hawkish views, since that hawkishness is usually an integral part of “centrist” posturing. Just as Bloomberg has no interest in challenging concentrated wealth and power in domestic affairs, he has no desire to challenge the status quo in foreign affairs, either. His foreign policy is to Washington’s militarism what his domestic views are to plutocracy. Bloomberg manages to have a lot of the same foreign policy baggage that Hillary Clinton had while still having no foreign policy experience. There are many reasons why Bloomberg is an awful fit with the Democratic Party, but on foreign policy he is particularly out of step and out of touch with where Democratic voters want to go. As we can see from recent surveys of public opinion, he is also out of step with a majority of all Americans.

Bloomberg’s Awful Foreign Policy

Bloomberg is just another corporate candidate that is pro war and pro MIC……that eliminates him for my support if and when my candidate calls it quits.

Be Smart!

Learn Stuff!


“Lego Ergo Scribo”

8 thoughts on “Bloomberg And Foreign Policy

  1. There is some evidence that people like very rich candidates because it makes them believe that one day they might also be rich. I never understood that argument myself. 🙂
    Best wishes, Pete.

  2. In Atlanta we have been seeing Bloomberg’s add several times a day. Ads are well done. We must be one if the state’s he has targeted as a possible flip.
    Steyer has. been running more adds than Bloomberg.

  3. I am pleased to announce that I am in total agreement with you on Bloombust and his chances.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.