We have heard all the clap trap about the Dems and we have have heard the plan from the Repubs…wait…my bad there is no plan coming from the Repubs……but there are others out there that have plans…..some pretty good some not so…..but at least they are trying to find a balance….
“A Better Way To Health Reform” written by Martin Feldstein in the WaPo….excerpts quoted below:
A good health insurance system should 1) guarantee that everyone can obtain appropriate care even when the price of that care is very high and 2) prevent the financial hardship or personal bankruptcy that can now result from large medical bills
A good system should not try to pay all health-care bills. That would lead to excessive demand, wasteful use of expensive technology and, inevitably, rationing in which health-care decisions are taken away from patients and their physicians. Countries that provide health care to all are forced to deny some treatments and diagnostic tests that most Americans have come to expect.
Here’s a better alternative. Let’s scrap the $220 billion annual health insurance tax subsidy, which is often used to buy the wrong kind of insurance, and use those budget dollars to provide insurance that protects American families from health costs that exceed 15 percent of their income.
Specifically, the government would give each individual or family a voucher that would permit taxpayers to buy a policy from a private insurer that would pay all allowable health costs in excess of 15 percent of the family’s income. A typical American family with income of $50,000 would be eligible for a voucher worth about $3,500, the actuarial cost of a policy that would pay all of that family’s health bills in excess of $7,500 a year.
The family could give this $3,500 voucher to any insurance company or health maintenance organization, including the provider of the individual’s current employer-based insurance plan. Some families would choose the simple option of paying out of pocket for the care up to that 15 percent threshold. Others would want to reduce the maximum potential out-of-pocket cost to less than 15 percent of income and would pay a premium to the insurance company to expand their coverage. Some families might want to use the voucher to pay for membership in a health maintenance organization. Each option would provide a discipline on demand that would help to limit the rise in health-care costs.
Two related problems remain. First, how would families find the cash to pay for large medical and hospital bills that fall under the 15 percent limit? While it would be reasonable for a family that earns $50,000 a year to save to be prepared to pay a health bill of, say, $5,000, what if a family without savings is suddenly hit with such a large hospital bill? Second, how would doctors and hospitals be confident that patients with the new high deductibles will pay their bills?The simplest solution would be for the government to issue a health-care credit card to every family along with the insurance voucher. The credit card would allow the family to charge any medical expenses below the deductible limit, or 15 percent of adjusted gross income. (With its information on card holders, the government is in a good position to be repaid or garnish wages if necessary.) No one would be required to use such a credit card. Individuals could pay cash at the time of care, could use a personal credit card or could arrange credit directly from the provider. But the government-issued credit card would be a back-up to reassure patients and providers that they would always be able to pay.
I am not endorsing what Mr. Feldstein is saying, but at least he has some ideas…which is more than we can say for a wealth of people on the Right.
What the final bill will look like is anyone’s guess….but I would almost bet that it will look nothing like a real “public option”…..most likely some pale imitation of the original concept…….but I think that ALL viable conceptions and solutions should get their day and then the best of ALL should be the final bill…..it is that simple….no need to turn it into rocket science….
It IS one answer at least. It’s got some shortcomings, but at least it does mean that the health professionals are not spending all their time and half the hospital’s budget on filling in government forms as happens in the UK.
I have to say I agree with most of the points he makes since he has CLEARLY identified the principal problems that the public option and its siblings suffer from. I’m just not particularly keen on his answers although they ARE worth discussing in the hope that some slightly better option might be brought to light – a sort of eureka moment.
However, one BIG thing this post and that suggestion underlines – calm, sensible and thoughtful discussion CAN produce results and there may well be one or more that will suit most people’s needs and prejudices. Republicans please bloody well NOTE!
Morning Quin…sorry for the delay in my reply…yesterday was my day to lecture…..I do agree that calm, civil, discussion is the only way to govern but the partisan crap playing now is just silly…..
I feel this is one of the so much important info for me. And i’m happy reading your article.
Thanx for the visit…..please come again there is always good info here….I am a bit biased but that’s okay….I deserve it….LOL