“Hillary Clinton Will Win, But She Doesn’t Deserve To”

Yesterday I wrote about the possibility of Trump winning the election…..it was an analysis in The Nation magazine……

Today I found another analysis on the 2016 election that says the Clinton will most likely win the election….but if she does…does she deserve to?

The former secretary of state may well be the second coming of George H.W. Bush: A time-server with no grasp of the future.

Among the many implications of FBI Director James Comey’s recommendation that the Department of Justice bring no charges against Hillary Clinton for using a private email server while secretary of state, the single-biggest one is this: She now has a clear path to becoming the next president of the United States. As disliked as she is (56 percent of Americans dislike her), she is less disliked than Donald Trump, the presumptive Republican nominee, and thus more likely to win in November.

Source: “Hillary Clinton Will Win, But She Doesn’t Deserve To” – Hit & Run : Reason.com

It is no secret that I have NO faith in either of the candidates to do the right thing for the country and its people….

I shall look elsewhere!

28 thoughts on ““Hillary Clinton Will Win, But She Doesn’t Deserve To”

  1. If you feel she’ll win, then that’s even more pressure on us to get people out to vote who want Trump and a LEGAL government.

    1. I personally think that it is a toss up…..until we rid ourselves of the electoral college we will NEVER have a legal government…

      1. Martha Stuart went to jail because she lied to a federal agent about $35,ooo – Hillary lies about sending Top Secret info and she not only walks but is running for pres.?
        Trump is not a politician, but aren’t you sick and tired of the lies the politicians have been giving you all these years? Just maybe he is exactly the shake-up that Washington needs!

  2. ‘I shall look elsewhere!’
    Pray tell me where?
    I am in ostrich position….
    I see no evil
    I hear no evil
    I speak no evil
    ;(

      1. As long as ‘they’ are squeaky’ clean…

      2. Hmmmmm…let me ponder…..
        I think Corbyn is probably closest and the knives are out…..we are doing our best on this side of the pond to support him…
        “There is a generation, whose teeth are as swords, and their jaw teeth as knives, to devour the poor from off the earth, and the needy from among men”

  3. I can even see a scenario where Trump is winning in the polls going into November, then sticks his polished shoe in his mouth and blows it all. You are correct. She will win, but the only thing she deserves is to wear an orange pantsuit in prison.

    1. I feel the same….if he can keep his stupidity in silence he could win…..she deserves nothing from me…all I can do is keep letting people know of her antics…..

  4. My immediate reaction is to point out, Chomsky-like, how manipulative the entire article is, even though coming from a site which touts itself as “Reason.com”. While implying the unsuitability of HC, they reinforce the “inevitability” of her election success, right in the headline. Then, by using the poll numbers, (statistics, right? Can say anything at all….), they assume the mantle of apparent honesty (56% don’t like her”… If that were true, it means more than one hundred eighty million people don’t like her, but, she’ll win anyway? Hmm…), thus legitimizing the goal, of getting the favored candidate into the position to protect corporate interests….

    It’s ALL a sham, ffolkes. It has nothing to do with reality.

    gigoid, the dubious

      1. *smile* I’ve heard of her, and will look at the link, but, to be honest, I am quite certain there is no one at all qualified for the position; never has been…. No human is such they are capable of ruling over other humans; they become corrupt every damn time… And, it is my firm opinion anyone who WANTS the job should never ever be allowed to have it.

        gigoid, the dubious

  5. At best, this election is a lose, lose, and lose scenario. There are no winning choices.

    So as long as the logic behind a person’s choice is reasonably sound (For example: I like walls! Well, she’s better than Orange Mussolini. At least I voted for something…that had no hope of finishing better than a distant 3rd) …and they aren’t expecting much…I can’t really blame anyone for voting the way they’re going to vote.

    It’s a total “Hanging, lethal injection, or electric chair?” choice to make.

      1. Ha, I cut that out in my final draft. Too many options sounds “too democratic”. I figured I was pushing the limit with 3.

Leave a Reply