The brains of children from low-income families process information differently to those of their wealthier counterparts, US research suggests.
Normal nine and 10-year-olds from rich and poor backgrounds had differing electrical activity in a part of the brain linked to problem solving.
The 26 children in the study, conducted at the University of California, Berkeley, were measured using an electroencephalograph (EEG), which measured activity in the “prefrontal cortex” of the brain.
Half were from low income homes, and half from high income families.
During the test, an image the children had not been briefed to expect was flashed onto a screen, and their brain responses were measured.
Those from lower income families showed a lower prefrontal cortex response to it than those from wealthier households.
Dr Mark Kishiyama, one of the researchers, said: “The low socioeconomic kids were not detecting or processing the visual stimuli as well – they were not getting that extra boost from the prefrontal cortex.”
Since the children were, in health terms, normal in every way, the researchers suspected that “stressful environments” created by low socioeconomic status might be to blame.
Previous studies have suggested that children in low-income families are spoken to far less – on average hearing 30 million fewer words by the age of four.
Professor Robert Knight, added: “This is a wake-up call – it’s not just that these kids are poor and more likely to have health problems, but they might actually not be getting full brain development from the stressful and relatively impoverished environment associated with low socioeconomic status.”
“The study showed that low socioeconomic status children behaved exactly the same way as high socioeconomic status children, but their brain processed the information differently.”
Whatever!
I wonder if they compared the EEGs of the low status children to the EEGs of high status children that were younger. I think that might have been something that would have been interesting to study.
As part of my foster care training, we were told that many of these children are going to be emotionally, intellectually, and (in extreme cases) physically behind children raised in normal environments. For example, the kid is probably 2-3 years behind her peers emotionally because of the nature of the environment in which she was raised. I am wondering what they are seeing in the low status children is actually a much milder form of what happens to abused and neglected children.
That is an interesting question and something I had not considered when I read the original story….
I’m a fan of this blog, keep updating it regularly.