The Cut, Cap And Balance Two-Step (Part 2)

Usually I take the weekend for some Zen….but the debt thing is keeping me from clearing my mind of the numbing effect of American politics…….

With the “CUT” section behind us….I will turn to the “CAP” portion of the evening……once again I will let FleetAdmiralJ of Blue Wave News explain this section…..in case you have the patience of a oversexed rabbit you can go to blogroll and get the whole thing at one time…..and if that is too difficult then try this……http://bit.ly/mRYhLS

Title II: “Cap”

Section 201(a), as far as I can tell, removes section (c)(4) from this piece of the US Code, which eliminates certain discretionary budget categories, including “highway category,” “mass transit category,” “conservation spending category,” “Federal and State Land and Water Conservation Fund sub-category,” among others. I don’t think this prohibits funds from being spent for these things, but it appears to eliminate them as distinct budget categories. It then adds to the US Code, this:

“The term ‘GDP’, for any fiscal year, means the gross domestic product during such fiscal year consistent with Department of Commerce definitions.”

Section 201(b) then limits total outlays (both on and off budget) to:

  • 21.7% of GDP in 2013
  • 20.8% of GDP in 2014
  • 20.2% of GDP in 2015
  • 20.1% of GDP in 2016
  • 19.9% of GDP in 2017
  • 19.7% of GDP in 2018
  • 19.9% of GDP in 2019, 2020, and 2021

Just as comparison, federal outlays for the past 40 years have averaged at about 20.6% of GDP, though FY 2009 and FY 2010 averaged at 24.4% of GDP.

Finally 201(b) says that if outlays are over, sequestration measures should be taken, though Medicare, Social Security, military pay, military retirement, veterans benefits, and national debt interest are exempt.

Read the last paragraph!  And then tell me what is left to cap?  Oh, let me guess….such non-essentials as education?  There are only so many programs left and the ones that are will do little to balance anything……

About these ads

2 Comments on “The Cut, Cap And Balance Two-Step (Part 2)”

  1. Quin says:

    So, they’re only going to shit on military personnel (i.e. for instance, veterans and current servicemen and women), but HARDWARE spending appears to remain untouched – or have I missed something?

    I wonder why that is (in the midst of such a financial crisis as this apparently is)?

    • lobotero says:

      The whole thing is just BS….it is all spending and such and NOTHING to help bring in more cash…….Quin, this is all a game….they have NO idea how to tackle the jobs thing so they give us this crap to focus on……


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 453 other followers