Since the election of the Orange Man from Florida the DNC has been struggling with their message…..is it possible they could find it before the next election?
With an election coming soon I have been looking that the Dems and their party in the coming years.
Their biggest problem is they are mostly old farts….
A generational clash is intensifying within the Democratic Party, as younger politicians challenge a leadership class that some say refuses to cede power and risks alienating voters. Veteran lawmakers such as 88-year-old Eleanor Holmes Norton, DC’s delegate to the House of Representatives since 1991, and senators in their 70s and 80s remain fixtures in Congress—even as millennials and Generation Z members now outnumber baby boomers in the adult population but hold far fewer seats, reports Rebecca Traister for the Intelligencer. The article describes incidents such as lawmakers physically struggling to navigate the Capitol or missing votes due to illness, but then running again anyway. One former member tells of an older colleague who, when asked why he doesn’t retire, simply asked, “Well, what would I do?” The power struggle is playing out in races across the country.
In Maine, 77-year-old Gov. Janet Mills, hopes to become the oldest freshman ever elected to the Senate in her primary campaign against 41-year-old oyster farmer Graham Platner. In Massachusetts, Seth Moulton, 47, is challenging Sen. Ed Markey, 79, while in New York City, 34-year-old Zohran Mamdani ran against and defeated 67-year-old Andrew Cuomo and 71-year-old Curtis Sliwa for mayor. While some of the older Democrats are stepping aside—for example, ex-New Hampshire Rep. Annie Kuster and Minnesota Sen. Tina Smith—many aren’t. And some, like Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, are seen as actively working to keep younger candidates from gaining power. “While the olds may think they are saving us by sticking around, what they are often doing is denying the future itself just when Americans most keenly long to be reminded that there is one ahead of us,” Traister writes.
So new ideas are in short supply.
Plus since the 1990s Dems have been corporate controlled….
This time analysts are saying that the Dems, who have been struggling with messaging, have found the hook they need…..and that message is economics.
Democrats say: “They’re spineless,” Cathia Krehbiel, 48, of Indianola, Iowa, said of her party’s leaders. “I just feel like there’s so much recently that’s just going abhorrently wrong. And they speak up a little bit and they roll right over.” Overall, roughly one-third of Democrats described their party negatively in the open-ended question. About 15% described it using words like weak, or apathetic, while an additional 10% believe it is broadly ineffective or disorganized. Only about 2 in 10 Democrats described their party positively, with roughly 1 in 10 saying it is empathetic or inclusive. An additional 1 in 10 used more general positive descriptors. Jim Williams, a 78-year-old retiree from Harper Woods, Michigan said he typically supports Democrats but is disappointed with the party and its murky message. He feels much worse about the Republican Party, which he said “has lost it” under Trump’s leadership. “All he does is bully and call names. They’ve got no morals, no ethics. And the more they back him, the less I like them,” the self-described independent, said of Trump.
Trump was furious. “In just 6 months, I cut costs, especially Energy and Taxes, Tremendously. Elizabeth ‘Pocahontas’ Warren, on CNBC, said costs have gone up,” he wrote on Truth Social, using his long-standing offensive nickname for the senator. “She is just angry that I blew up her terrible Presidential Campaign. Call her out!!!”
Trump’s wrong. Prices are going up on just about everything. “Government data, including from the Commerce Department this week, show that prices rose in June on items heavily exposed to tariffs, such as home furnishings, toys and appliances,” The New York Timesreported over the weekend. That’s Trump’s Commerce Department. He may be trying to cook the books in other areas—notably by firing the federal official tasked with collecting (recently disappointing) jobs data—but he can’t hide the fact that the economy is getting worse.
In the coming 2026 midterms and the economy the way it is there should be an open door for a Dem win…..but is it?
The 2026 midterm elections should, by all rights, be good for Democrats.
That’s because midterms are almost always good for the party that doesn’t hold the presidency; that party has gained House seats in all but four midterms since the Civil War.
However, there is a sizeable “but” that comes along with that right now.
It’s looking like Democrats could squander at least some of that opportunity, if they don’t do something about their brand, which is historically awful right now.
That doesn’t mean they’ll lose the midterms. But it could mean they won’t take full advantage and grow their numbers as much as they could.
Me? I think if anybody can find a way to lose then the Dems are that entity….their messaging for decades has been sub-par for decades….a lot can happen between now and the election and if a way can be found then the Dems will have their asses handed to them…..yet again.
Why?
Well the top Dem senator candidates are just a repeat of the past….old farts with heavy corporate ties….so much for looking for new blood.
That is why Dems are running scared because of the rise of the Progressives…..
…
Democratic party leaders havebeenaccusedof a wave of poor performances that go back far beyond last year’s chastening presidential defeat.
The party elite’s support for Israel’s war on Gaza, which has killed more than 69,000 Palestinians, have turnedvoters and donorsaway from the party. As have other incidents. In Illinois, Democratic US representative Chuy García’s plan to handpick his own successor upon his retirement next year, circumventing an open election, drew howls of criticism from all sides of the political divide.
Rightwing media outlets have gone after Democrats’ low favorability ratings and the party’s apparent refusal to integrateyounger members into its leadership, at a time when the Republican party made JD Vance a vice-presidential candidate last year at the age of 40.
Democrat warns US progressives against moving toward the center: ‘It lost me the election’
However, observers say that the Democratic party’s failure to secure the continuation of federal subsidies for health insurance for millions of Americans last month, a move that ended the 43-day government shutdown, could have the most lasting negative effect on the party going forward.
The most frustrating thing about the Dems right now is that while they are doing well at the local level, at the national level they’re a complete and total mess. They have no unifying voice, no unifying message, no unifying spokesperson. At the local level we have strong candidates with strong voices running in the upcoming races. But nationally it is a complete and total…. I dislike using this term but it is the most appropriate: At the national level the Democratic party is a complete and total cluster fuck.
But nationally they got nothing. The Dems in congress for the most part come off as being confused, cowardly, afraid of standing up for anything, and being completely ineffective in Congress. Bernie Sanders was once a sort of unifying voice but he’s 84 years old, for heaven’s sake and he has, understandably, slowed down and become less confrontational. AOC? Even she’s become more quiet, less confrontational, less controversial. The Democratic party is, at the moment, a ship without a rudder. There is no one willing or capable of steering them in any specific direction, no one prodding them on, no one poking them with a stick and urging them to actually do something.
It reminds me of the situation here. We get rid of a Conservative government and vote in a supposedly socialist-minded progressive party, the Labour Party. But we get the same deal, albeit with different faces in charge. WEF control, Israeli control, globalist money control, oligarch control. Two identical parties, only the names are different.
Best wishes, Pete.
You know, at this stage Atilla the Hun would be an improvement. I think we need to think less about parties and who does what to whom in them, and more about the people themselves. in ANY party, Trump would be a shuffling farting disaster. it should be about the man, not the party he claims.
Judy for decades the American voter has done so on personality not stands….wed need firm stands and people willing to go down with those policies. chuq
The most frustrating thing about the Dems right now is that while they are doing well at the local level, at the national level they’re a complete and total mess. They have no unifying voice, no unifying message, no unifying spokesperson. At the local level we have strong candidates with strong voices running in the upcoming races. But nationally it is a complete and total…. I dislike using this term but it is the most appropriate: At the national level the Democratic party is a complete and total cluster fuck.
But nationally they got nothing. The Dems in congress for the most part come off as being confused, cowardly, afraid of standing up for anything, and being completely ineffective in Congress. Bernie Sanders was once a sort of unifying voice but he’s 84 years old, for heaven’s sake and he has, understandably, slowed down and become less confrontational. AOC? Even she’s become more quiet, less confrontational, less controversial. The Democratic party is, at the moment, a ship without a rudder. There is no one willing or capable of steering them in any specific direction, no one prodding them on, no one poking them with a stick and urging them to actually do something.
Well said. Money is doing their talking for them….lobbyists are their only friends. chuq
It reminds me of the situation here. We get rid of a Conservative government and vote in a supposedly socialist-minded progressive party, the Labour Party. But we get the same deal, albeit with different faces in charge. WEF control, Israeli control, globalist money control, oligarch control. Two identical parties, only the names are different.
Best wishes, Pete.
THe same coin just two sides……chuq
You know, at this stage Atilla the Hun would be an improvement. I think we need to think less about parties and who does what to whom in them, and more about the people themselves. in ANY party, Trump would be a shuffling farting disaster. it should be about the man, not the party he claims.
Judy for decades the American voter has done so on personality not stands….wed need firm stands and people willing to go down with those policies. chuq