For the last couple of years there has been a wealth of condemnation of Obama’s policies aboard….and some of them from me…..but most of it coming from the GOP and especially from those that jumped onto the presidential bandwagon…
I read an article recently in The American Conservative about this very subject……..
Yoni Appelbaum relays a questionable claim from Richard Haass:
President Obama’s term in office, said Richard Haass, the president of the Council on Foreign Relations, was marked by the pendulum swinging toward caution. “Much of his administration was a conscious reaction what he saw of his predecessor of trying to do much,” he said. “Seeing the dangers of doing too much, he opted to do less, and I think what historians will see is that he opted to do too little in places [bold mine-DL].”
I don’t know how future historians will view Obama’s foreign policy, and neither does Haass. It is interesting that Haass chooses to put it this way, since he is really making a statement about how much of the contemporary foreign policy establishment views Obama’s record. It is Haass and many of his colleagues that now think Obama has done “too little in places,” which is tied up with their support for an exaggerated, activist U.S. role in the world. Obama has actually been a very activist foreign policy president in both terms, but on certain issues he has not been quite as aggressive as many in the foreign policy establishment wanted him to be, and so they conclude that he did “too little.” Haass invokes future historians to make his assessment seem objective and disinterested, but it just a way to smuggle in the objections of administration critics that want a more meddlesome foreign policy.
Source: Has Obama Done ‘Too Little’ Abroad? | The American Conservative
I agree that he has done little….but I feel he has done little to promote a peaceful settlement of the events that he chose to involve the US in…..
The problem is that his record will be a bright one once it is compared to whoever wins this election….the US is going to be ass deep in everyone’s problems from 2017 onward.
I think Obama & Co…..might try looking inwards for a change…
A Period of Major Civil Unrest is Coming – How to Win an Inevitable Confrontation with the Status Quo http://libertyblitzkrieg.com/2016/07/06/a-period-of-major-civil-unrest-is-coming-how-to-win-the-inevitable-confrontation-with-the-status-quo/
President Obama Explains His ‘Strategy’ In Afghanistan – Live Feed | Zero Hedge http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-07-06/president-obama-explains-his-strategy-afghanistan-live-feed
Yeah I saw that…it is total BS….
Aside from adding more wars to the US Empire’s growing list of wars, the mass spying on everyone in the world with a pulse, sending Flying Death Robots to serve up the “Murder Du Jour”…and promoting the TPP….
Yeah, that fucker has done jack squat internationally!
Does make a point huh?
Faded again; be back in the AM…. In short, though, my immediate reaction to the title was “Hasn’t he done enough already?”….
gigoid, the dubious
I kind of had the same feeling as gigoid too. When I got through the whole article, I can see that Obama may actually be viewed in a better light because he almost maintained the status quo but he sure didn’t seem to remain on the “fast” track to change he promoted. I know…I know…not having a majority in Congress was a real bummer for him but he (and I hesitate to say this because of rebuttal) he seems to be the “whitest” black man I’ve ever voted for. ~~dru~~
He was and is a typical neoliberal something I said back in 2008 and was shouted down because I was speaking ill of a black pres…..I love being right…LOL chuq
Giggle….yes I was one of those shouting people down….live and learn. ~~dru~~~