And not for the reasons we are debating…..I am scared because for the first time in 50 years I am on the same side of an argument as my conserv friends……it scares me because many liberals are also opposed to our intervention in Syria……even conservs are battling among themselves on the necessity of the force by the US……
When President Obama addresses the nation on Tuesday about Syria, he’ll no doubt be hoping to sway members of Congress, too. Just how tricky that will be is made clear by the Washington Post, which reports that opposition to any such military strike has managed the rare feat of uniting liberal Democrats and libertarian Republicans. The story focuses on Alan Grayson on the left and Ted Yoho on the right, both Florida representatives. “We’re gonna win,” says Grayson. “Pretty sure.” The Post‘s count suggests they’ve got a clear advantage. It has more than 100 members “solidly against” military action, and the same number leaning against. Another 185 are undecided. Those definitely in favor? Just 25, though that includes the top two leaders from each party (Boehner, Cantor, Pelosi, and Hoyer.) “This is a remarkable moment in American politics,” write David A. Fahrenthold and Paul Kane. “A demonstration that the power of parties may be ebbing after a period of strong partisan discipline.” Things are much closer in the Senate, and Harry Reid predicted today that he’ll get his 60 votes, reports Politico. Meanwhile, a memo from Cantor to GOP lawmakers says they should expect a vote “in the next two weeks.” That suggests to the Hill that House leaders are considering delaying the vote from next week to the one following.
In the olden days I was a long hippie radical and was put down constantly by “high and tight” conservs, the old hard hat conserv….but now things have changed….scary!
As the ongoing debate in Congress makes clear, the decision on whether to strike Syria isn’t the usual bipartisan one. Here are two voices on the right who come to very different conclusions:
- Peggy Noonan, opposed: What’s the strategy again? “A small, limited strike will look merely symbolic, a face-saving measure,” she writes in the Wall Street Journal. “A strong, broad strike opens the possibility of civil war, and a victory for those as bad as or worse than Assad.” The world must send a message to Syria’s regime, but a military strike isn’t the answer. “Sometimes it shows strength to hold your fire.” Read her full column.
- Bill Kristol, in favor: Republicans might be tempted to vote no to signal their lack of confidence in President Obama, but that would be a mistake, writes the editor of the Weekly Standard. They’d be weakening the country along with the president. “A party that for at least two generations has held high the banner of American leadership and strength should not cast a vote that obviously risks a damaging erosion of this country’s stature and credibility abroad,” he writes. “For reasons both fastidiously statesmanlike and crassly political, Yes is the right vote.” Read his full column.
I agree with Peggy Noonan! I have NEVER agreed with her on anything! We may be one the same page but for different reasons…..but still…..I Agree With Noonan!
I keep waiting for me to wake up from this nightmare so I can run outside to see if Hell is truly frozen.
Am I dreaming?

