This series I am writing is letting the less informed of what they are getting for their vote…..
Trump is proving that he has no intention of trying to make America great again but the silly nominations that he is putting forth……especially when it comes to foreign policy.
Hegseth for Secretary of War….a person with limited experience other than he was in the military….I was also in the military does that make me eligible for the position?
Little Marco Rubio as SecState….another bad choice…..he is a China hawk…..and a Iran Hawk…..is an agent for defense industry and AIPAC…none of which will make him a good SecState….
Of all Trump’s choices for his foreign policy team, Marco Rubio is the least controversial to the neoconservative foreign policy establishment in Washington, and the most certain to provide continuity with all that is wrong with U.S. foreign policy, from Cuba to the Middle East to China.
The only area where there might be some hope for ending a war is Ukraine, where Rubio has come close to Donald Trump’s position, praising Ukraine for standing up to Russia, but recognizing that the U.S. is funding a deadly “stalemate war” that needs to be “brought to a conclusion.”
But in all the other hot spots around the world, Rubio is likely to make conflicts even hotter, or start new ones.
Then DNI, Gabbard….why?
Can some explain these choices?
Here are a few theories on his choices….
What do card sharks, magicians, pickpockets, and tyrants do to hide their tricks? They deflect your attention. “Look over here!” they say, as they create a commotion that preoccupies your mind while they bamboozle you.
At first, I thought Trump’s gonzo nominations were intended to flood the zone — overwhelm us, demoralize us, cause us to lose our minds.
Alternatively, I thought, they had a strategic purpose: Smoke out Senate Republicans who might stand in Trump’s way on other issues — such as allying with Putin and destroying NATO — so Trump could purge the holdouts through primary challengers and angry MAGAs.
But while flooding the zone and purging recalcitrant Senate Republicans may be part of it, I’ve come to think there’s a larger plan at work.
https://www.alternet.org/card-game-tricks-and-trumps/
This another theory on these historically bad choices for cabinet members….
“Each of them individually is historically bad,” said Snyder. “But taken together, these are not people who are going to be bad at their jobs in some sort of normal sense. Taken together, these appointments suggest an attempt to actually make the American government dysfunctional, to make it fall apart, to pervert it, to have it do things that it’s not supposed to do until it’s not capable of doing anything at all.”
For instance, Trump’s choice for director of national intelligence, former Hawaii Representative Tulsi Gabbard, regularly amplifies Russian propaganda and conspiracy theories. Her role would have her oversee 18 intelligence agencies, but critics—even in the House Intelligence Committee—have drawn attention to the danger of her nomination considering her particular affinity for foreign dictators such as Syrian President Bashar Al Assad and Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Responding to a clip of Gabbard from February 2022—shortly after Russia invaded Ukraine—in which the former Democrat claimed that Ukraine should “embrace the spirit of Aloha” and relinquish any military alliances with NATO or Russia, Snyder argued that “it’s not just that these people are not qualified enough.”
“It’s not just that they’re totally unqualified, it’s that they’re anti-qualified. They are qualified to do the opposite of the thing that they are supposed to do,” Snyder said.
“Tulsi Gabbard is talking about a moment when Russian forces are approaching the Ukrainian capital. When Russian assassination squads are attempting to kill the Ukrainian head of state, and she’s advising people that all we have to do is summon up a magic word, and in effect surrender all of Ukraine to Russia,” Snyder continued. “And it’s not naïve. It sounds naïve but it’s not. What it’s doing is trying to prepare the way for more Ukrainian suffering. It’s saying, he who invades is right.”
(newrepublic.com)
You may not care and that is your choice but I believe that you should if you care anything about this country.
Will these tools be any help?
Will these tools get us into international hot water?
Since I am a nerd for foreign policy I would like a deeper dive in his choices…..
Mythology has always played a central role in American politics and once a falsehood is sculpted, the premise becomes very difficult to break.
When it comes to Donald Trump, one of the most prevalent fabrications surrounds the 45th [and now also the 47th] president’s war record. According to many MAGA loyalists, Trump is significantly less hawkish than the presidents who’ve served before and after his time in the White House. This lie is so widespread that even many of those who openly oppose the president feel the need to partake in this ill-placed and undeserved praise.
Any notion that Trump was a peace-seeking commander-in-chief who spent his time in the Oval Office fighting America’s war machine is a fantasy coated in convenient omissions, blatant lies, and wishful thinking.Anyone still unconvinced by his record should consider some of the cabinet picks Trump’s floated since winning re-election. Although only a few nominations have been announced, the names that Trump’s transition team has publicized should serve as a solid indicator of what foreign policy in a second Trump term will look like. Just as he did the first time around, Trump appears to be filling his administration with a slate of neocons with some rather disturbing views about the US government’s role in the world.
https://issuechronicle.substack.com/p/the-foreign-policy-cabinet-of-the
None of this screams confidence to me…..how about you?
Will you pay attention (I know a bit much to ask).
I Read, I Write, you Know
“lego ergo scribo”