Super Tuesday–Where’s The Hype?

Today is what has been called ‘Super Tuesday’ because many states , 15 to be exact, hold there presidential primaries. And in elections past it was a super big deal the media would have people on every street corner getting the news for our consumption….but this year the hype is just not there, at least from what I am seeing.

Since I am a political junkie let me be the hype for your consumption….

Another Super Tuesday is upon us. Fifteen states and one US territory vote on this, the biggest voting day of the 2024 presidential primary season, and while the overall picture of what’s to come is fairly predictable—President Biden and Donald Trump will continue what appears to be their inevitable march toward a rematch, most likely—there are still questions to be answered and insights to be gleaned. A look at the coverage surrounding Tuesday’s contests:

  • 3 questions the day might answer: That’s how USA Today frames its preview of Super Tuesday, and those questions are: Will Nikki Haley drop out if she fails to score any big wins? Will Trump start moving more toward the center if he does score a number of big wins, in a bid to court more moderates and independents in the general election? The third question looks away from the presidential primary to wonder who will advance in California Senate race, in which a number of big names are running for Dianne Feinstein’s old seat.
  • The day’s “storylines”: That’s one of the topics in CNN‘s preview, and, in addition to the question of what will become of Haley (which is raised in almost every outlet’s Super Tuesday preview), the other storyline mentioned is Biden’s “wake-up call” in Michigan, where he lost two delegates to “uncommitted,” the option more than 100,000 Democrat voters chose as a way of protesting Biden’s Israel policy.
  • Something else the day could offer: While much of the situation may seem predictable, the Hill points out that “the results could provide insights on [Biden’s and Trump’s] strengths and weaknesses in certain states and voting blocs as the two frontrunners hurtle toward the general election.”
  • Big-picture reading: NPR offers a look at some of the historical and big-picture context around Super Tuesday, and one of the points it makes is that since most delegates are awarded in a winner-take-all method, a frontrunner can gain an “insurmountable lead” on Super Tuesday.
  • The nitty-gritty: CBS News offers a rundown of all the voting hours state by state and how to watch coverage of the results. Regardless of how any of the candidates do, no one is likely to get enough delegates to clinch their party’s nomination until contests on March 12 or 19.

Is the lack of media interest due to the 2 candidates that have this thing all rolled up?

Or could it be that no one really gives a crap?

This is proves that this election is as boring as watching flies mate.

Whatever the reason you can always count on the Old Professor to try and get the news to you in a timely way.

Be Smart!

Learn Stuff!

I Read, I Write, You Know

“lego ergo scribo”

Ever Hear Of The Truman Committee?

Basically it was a good idea to draw in the massive defense spending….to make it more accountable and responsible….

I have been railing about the amount of money that is thrown at the Pentagon….the massive profits of a few huge industry with a few players.

Then I recall something from our distant past that makes good sense.

On February 10, 1941, a relatively unknown senator, Democrat Harry S. Truman of Missouri, rose on the Senate floor to deliver a speech that would forever change his destiny. Though the United States officially remained “neutral” to the war raging in Europe, the German invasion and occupation of France and the Low Countries in 1940 prompted action by the U.S. government. President Franklin Roosevelt requested, and Congress hastily appropriated, more than $10.5 billion to bolster national defense buildup. A former small business owner, Truman cautioned against awarding defense contracts in a way that “make[s] the big men bigger and let[s] the little men go out of business or starve to death.” He advised against distributing contracts “on the basis of friendship or political affiliation.” Championing legislative oversight, Truman proposed an “investigation of the national defense program and the handling of contracts.”

This became known as the ‘Truman Committee’….

I bring this up because someone in Congress has floated the idea of a ‘Truman Committee’ to be reestablished….

U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders has a novel way to stop military-industrial complex profiteers from “bilking the American people”—and it’s actually over 80 years old.

In an article published Tuesday in The Atlantic, Sanders (I-Vt.) called for a revived Truman Committee—a World War II-era bipartisan congressional panel “designed to rein in defense contractors, closely oversee military contracts, and take back excessive payments.”

“America’s national priorities are badly misplaced,” the senator asserted. “Our country spends, with almost no debate, nearly $1 trillion a year on the military while at the same time ignoring massive problems at home. We apparently have unlimited amounts of money for nuclear weapons, fighter planes, bombs, and tanks. But somehow we can’t summon the resources to provide healthcare for all, childcare, affordable housing, and other basic needs.

“The United States remains the world’s dominant military power,” the senator continued. “Alone, we account for roughly 40% of global military spending; the U.S. spends more on its military than the next 10 countries combined, most of whom are allies. Last year, we spent more than three times what China spent on its military.”

Sanders noted that nearly half of the approximately $900 billion the U.S. will allocate for military spending this year “will go to a handful of huge defense contractors enjoying immense profits,” with many weapons companies profiting handsomely off sales to Ukraine, which is struggling to repel a two-year Russian invasion.

In what Sanders called a “particularly egregious example” of war profiteering, RTX Corporation—formerly Raytheon—has increased the price of its Stinger shoulder-launched surface-to-air missiles by 600% to $400,000 since the early 1990s.

https://www.commondreams.org/news/sanders-military-spending-2667378533

It amazes me that Americans will ignore this  situation but will fly off the handle when some woman in Bumfuk, Indiana gets $300 extra in her EBT card.

I think Bernie has a helluva idea….these parasites need to be investigated and punished…

But the industry has hundreds of lobbyists to spread the cash around to see that any oversight is squashed.

While Bernie has a good idea….money will decide the idea’s fate.

I Read, I Write, You Know

“lego ergo scribo”