No Labels–2024

College of Political Knowledge

2024 Election Series

This political group founded back in 2010, No Labels, pretends to be a Centrist organization that would be a go-between for Dems and Repubs…..it is a con.

I have written and given my opinions on this group and you can see my sage words here….this is my most recent post that includes thoughts from years past….

No Labels, The Con That Just Keeps Giving

I bring up this fringe group because there is a bit of news that pertains to the 2024 election….

Taking a page from parliamentary systems employed around the world, the No Labels organization is raising the idea of a coalition government taking charge in the US after the 2024 election. The opening would come up if no presidential candidate wins the 270 Electoral College votes required to take office, NBC News reports. In that case, “there could be negotiation to create a coalition government where electors get traded between different candidates to get somebody over 270,” said Ryan Clancy, chief strategist for No Labels, on Wednesday.

The next day, a co-founder, former US Rep. Tom Davis, talked about how his group’s ticket could make offers to Democrats or Republicans to reach a deal. “It could be Cabinet posts. It could be a policy concession,” Davis said. Or, he suggested, it could be the vice president’s job. The negotiations would be possible, Clancy said, because of “unbound electors,” which he pointed out are allowed in some states. Just 33 require electors to vote for the ticket that carried their popular vote, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

Clancy said forming a ruling coalition is just one idea; No Labels prefers to elect its own presidential candidate, per NBC. The Constitution’s 12th Amendment still calls for state delegations in the US House to vote for a candidate if nobody wins 270 Electoral College votes. Once 26 state delegations endorse the same candidate, the Senate would decide who the vice president would be. No Labels also is strategizing about how its ticket might win that way, Davis said: “We’ve mapped all this out.”

A coalition government?

What we have now cannot agree on much at all….why would a coalition government be any better?

Next speculation is swirling around the stepping down of the group’s co-chair…..

Larry Hogan is stepping down from his position as co-chair of the No Labels third-party movement, as speculation swirls that the former Maryland governor could himself end up running for president this year on a No Labels ticket. In a letter dated December 15, obtained and first reported by the AP, Hogan announces his resignation but praises the group and gives no details on why he’s leaving, Politico and the Hill report. “In stepping aside, it is my intent that new leaders, who can devote themselves full-time to the effort, will be able to take the helm to direct the No Labels political operation,” Hogan, a Republican, writes.

Hogan has in the past said the “door” was “cracked open” for a third-party presidential run, and his PAC has published ads hinting at the possibility of one. Joe Manchin, Joe Lieberman, and Liz Cheney also have ties to No Labels, which has pledged to run a unity ticket with one Republican and one Democrat. The news of Hogan’s departure came hours after NBC Washington and other outlets reported that the third-party group had obtained the necessary signatures to form a political party and get on the ballot in Maryland, one of more than a dozen states where it has done so thus far.

I have always thought this country needs a third party because nowadays our choices are dumb and dumber….but is this ‘centrist party’  the answer?

Not in my book….it would be just an added burden on the American people.

I Read, I Write, You Know

“lego ergo scribo”

Nukes In The UK

Let us take a trip down memory lane…..it is the 1980s….a protesxt, led by women, were put together to protest the US stationing cruise missiles with nuke tips on UK soil.

Thames Valley Police warned of the scale and nature of the anti-nuclear demonstration planned to take place on Saturday 25 June; and on the urgent MOD reinforcement operation comprising 100 MOD Police and a somewhat larger number of RAF personnel that had consequently been set in hand.

  1. In the event, the demonstration took place and, at its peak, about 1500 were present outside the perimeter. At about 3.00 pm, some 80 demonstrators penetrated the wire, in 5 separate places, and entered the base. They were swiftly contained by the MOD forces, but not before some of them had reached the runway on which they painted anti-nuclear slogans (which have now been removed). There was one arrest by MOD police, for damage to the window of an MOD police coach, but all trespassers were removed from the base by the early evening.
  2. This event was significant in three main respects. Firstly, it was evidence again of the general reliability of Thames Valley Police warnings of the likely nature scale of such demonstrations- even though on this occasion the warning came at a very late stage. Secondly, the civil police assessment that incursions were likely was fully borne out. Thirdly, the event was further confirmation that the Greenham Common perimeter is a particularly hard one to defend and that, whatever the scale of internal reinforcement, it is unrealistic to suppose that every incursion can be wholly prevented- as opposed to being swiftly contained.
  3. The Guardian today reported the incident, together with the creation of a peace camp outside RAF Cottesmore. Extra MDP personnel have been deployed there and also at Porton where there is also now some presence of demonstrators although the latter have not so far been reported to the press.

In case you were more interested than I gave you credit…..

I bring up this historical bit because once again the US is planning on nukes for the UK…..

The US will deploy nuclear weapons to the UK for the first time in 15 years in a move Russia will view as a provocation, The Telegraph reported, citing Pentagon documents.

Pentagon procurement contracts show that the US is planning to station B61-12 nuclear warheads at RAF Lakenheath, a base in Suffolk, England. The US pulled its nuclear weapons out of the UK in 2008, and its decision to redeploy them demonstrates the low state of US-Russia relations.

According to The Telegraph, Russia said a US deployment of nukes to the UK would be an “escalation” that would require “compensating counter-measures.”

The US already has nukes stationed in Germany, Belgium, Italy, Turkey, and the Netherlands as part of NATO’s nuclear sharing program. Last year, Russia announced it was deploying nuclear weapons to Belarus amid tensions over the proxy war in Ukraine. Russian President Vladimir Putin pointed to NATO’s nuclear sharing program to justify his decision.

The B61 is the US’s primary nuclear gravity bomb, and the B61-12 is its newest iteration. It’s considered a tactical nuclear weapon, which have a lower yield than strategic warheads. But the B61-12 has a maximum yield of 50 kilotons, more than three times as powerful as the bomb the US dropped on Hiroshima, Japan.

The UK has a nuclear arsenal of its own and announced in 2021 that it was expanding, raising questions about Britain’s commitment to the Non-Proliferation Treaty. The UK said it was raising the ceiling of its nuclear warhead stockpile from 180 to 240 and that it would no longer publish information about the number of warheads it maintains in an operational status.

Will this trigger the intensity of the protests from 40 years ago?

Please any UK readers that have an opinion on this let me know…..

Personally, I think women should get involved again.

I Read, I Write, You Know

“lego ergo scribo”