That would be Ayn not Paul…..just in case there was going to be a misunderstanding………
Since my mother was of the Jicarilla Apache nation….you might be able to see why I hate this broad!
So much for the concept of individual rights, huh?
That would be Ayn not Paul…..just in case there was going to be a misunderstanding………
Since my mother was of the Jicarilla Apache nation….you might be able to see why I hate this broad!
So much for the concept of individual rights, huh?
If forced to choose (and it would require forcing)…Even though there’s a lot of crossover, I’m picking Paul all the way. No contest.
I think the RNC will sabotage Paul…..the way they did against Newt in 2012….
Well, they gotta sabotage Trump first. Sabotaging him is the bigger priority.
(Note: Talking about Trump does NOT violate my vow not to discuss 2106 election…as Trump has NO intention of actually running…Unless, a couple of weeks before Iowa, it looks like he’s going to win Iowa/New Hampshire. Even then, he’d probably still drop out. )
I agree……first priority will be Trump…..he is a joke…..
Typical libertarian move. When pressed about land ownership, they fall back on the “labor theory of value” … If you work on it, you have a right to an ownership stake. Which of course is the centerpiece of Marxist reasoning. Hypocrisy at its best.