I have written in the past about Americans access to the web…mainly that I thought it was BS that more are not able to use the internet. When the Arab Spring started I recall a story that told how the protesters were using social networking to organize….it got me to thinking…..how can a country whose citizens make less than $5000 a year able to use an expensive service like broadband? How is the possible and since it is how come the US has should shoddy record with broadband and when you can get it…..it costs are almost prohibitive……..
I found an article on the US and broadband……….
Newser) – The real threat to US Internet isn’t foreign intervention—it’s that it currently sucks. Cable companies have kept access limited, expensive, and relatively slow by global standards, complains Susan Crawford at Wired. Roughly a third of Americans don’t have broadband access, and for about 19 million who live in rural areas, it’s not available at any price, because cable companies refuse to expand there. The FCC, which is supposed to ensure reasonably-priced communications access for all has “failed in that task,” Crawford writes.
“Yet we’re moving in the opposite direction,” with telecoms focusing on wireless, and refusing government subsidies to service rural areas. Cable companies “face no real competition or pricing pressure,” and we still have no national plan to switch to fiber-optic cables. Everyone in America should be able to get fast internet, voice, data, and basic cable for $30 a month, and if private companies won’t step up, the government should. “It’s embarrassing that one of the most innovative nations in the world can’t do this.” Read the full column here.
When will corporations let the country become a member of the 21st century?
Lobotero,
Internet companies been pissing me off for years. It’s ridiculous.
Yep. It seems the rest of the world have passed us by on this issue…..but I do not see any of it changing….
You’re probably right, Lobotero. It probably won’t change – in the immediate future, that is.
And what’s pathetic is that, without reports from magazines like Wired, the majority of the people would be none the wiser.
There has got to be a balance where profits and accessibility are both possible…..