Yep, that time again….another anal statement made by a public person…..another big mouth moron has opened his/her mouth and puked up a bunch of vile, idiotic and hateful rhetoric…..
This time it comes from a conserv social group, American Family Association, and their Director of Issues Analysis, Bryan Fischer….he made a sweeping statement…..
“Islam has no fundamental First Amendment claims, for the simple reason that it was not written to protect the religion of Islam,”
So the guarantee of freedom of religion is not apply to Muslims…is that about it? Does that also apply to atheists? How about Deists? Or is it just Muslims that do not have the freedom of religion?
Why do conservs, mostly, who try to imply that they alone can protect the Constitution are the ones that call for less freedoms? Is it just that they do NOT understand the wording of the Constitution? Or maybe that it was written only for them and their beliefs….
The more these people talk the more they prove just how un-American they are…once again I say…..either you are ALL in with the Constitution or you are ALL out…..you cannot pick and choose the parts you want to suit your limited mental capacity……
Which part, do you think, of the word “freedom” is it that these jerks don’t understand? Or is it perhaps that they want to split the word up (perhaps more than one syllable at a time is too much for them to cope with)… i.e. “free” (for them) to “dom”inate everyone else? Hateful people!
Let see…..does not some of the Islamic countries outlaw (basically) other religions and freedoms…..and yet we are better than them even though we are basically doing the same thing…..God! I hate these twits!
Yes, Chuq. It’s as I’ve often said – don’t do as I do, do as I tell you…
Quin, I think you meant to split it free-dumb.
Chuq, you know good and well when jesus founded America he meant freedom of “our” religion to remain exclusively christian.
On a serious note, it has been the lifes work of the right to attempt to deny rights to Americans. This new house of reps and newly elected tea baggers and mindless followers are picking and choosing the same way they do with the bible. You know, love thy neighbor (as long as he is white, conservative and Baptist and not gay) Ill think Ill pick and choose the laws I want to obey.
Phillip, watch for a post on the GOP….I take a closer look at their policies and see if you can spot the philosophy….
Ha, Ha, ha. I was thinking more of “Dom” and “Sub” because it’s always ordinary, decent people who end up as the sumissives being well screwed by these dicks, whether they want it or not.
Now that I think about it….you are right….does that make them masochistic?
Probably not deliberately, but effectively I think so, yes. 😆
I think they like it…..and that is the scary part for me……
Obviously he has a revulsion for any speech regarding religion even that written privately. He can not abide any public official State from using standardterms commonplace parlance that expresses or acknowledges the human sentimentof something beyond the secular. ..At the heart of this whole separation issue is a desire by the separationists that nothing be done or said by any individual holding any type of public office anywhere which impliesthat religion is part of our life.
I disagree……I think NO one in public sphere should use religion for any purpose to influence….that is a private decision and does not need to be in the act of governing…at least according to the Constitution….