I try to be fair and balanced in my writings and I try to give all sides to a debate on policy….
Not everyone is thrilled with the proposals that the Dems are offering up as health reform…….this from the Green Party, USA:
The ‘public option’ in the bill would enroll only 2% of the population by 2019. According to the Congressional Budget Office, the public option “would cost more than private plans” since it would enroll primarily the poorest and sickest members of society. Insurance companies will probably end up administering the public option plan. (Single-Payer ends the provision of health coverage by insurance companies, which raise health costs by nearly a third to cover overhead, administrative costs, CEO salaries, and profits for shareholders.)
Access to health insurance will still primarily be tied to employment. An employee who loses his or her job will still lose coverage. Employers, not employees, will choose their workers’ insurance company and their health care provider. (Single-Payer relieves businesses of the burden of providing health insurance benefits and allows Americans to choose their physician or hospital.)
The House bill further increases health care spending. The US already spends nearly double ($7,200 per capita) what other industrial countries spend for their citizens. To reduce the increase in costs to the federal government, the Democrats’ plan would push more and more of the financial burden for health care onto state governments and consumers, while reducing subsidies to consumers. (Past studies by the GAO and CBO confirm that Single-Payer would save hundreds of billions of dollars annually in total health care spending.)
The House bill denies health care for all immigrants, a restriction that would ultimately cost the US more in money and lives, since denial of treatment to anyone encourages the spread of disease among everyone, regardless of health coverage. (Single-Payer’s financial savings would fully offset the cost of health care for immigrants and improve the quality of health care for all.)
Tens of millions of Americans will either not be required to purchase insurance or will choose to pay a penalty rather than do so. Those who buy subsidized plans, mostly the working poor, will find that many services are not covered and that they will lack the funds to pay the deductibles and co-pays needed for medical treatment, since the plans are designed to only cover 70% of costs. (Single-Payer will offer comprehensive health care for everyone.)
The Dems have a hard sell even to their staunchest supporters…..it will be interesting to see how the final version of the bill will shake out……I bet that it will look nothing like a real reform bill….any takers?
It’s not much of a bet if it obvious that you’re right. 🙂
I am having a hard time with Dems that are trying to kill ALL health care….all in the name of abortion….I thought that they believed in a woman’s right of choice…..but what do I know?
I can’t see what’s wrong with the attitude that operates all across Europe – except the UK, where they give anyone anything they bloody well want provided they weren’t actually BORN in the UK and have paid taxes all their lives towards it – in which case they’ll struggle to get anything at all…
Sorry, I digress again, don’t I? Anyway, if it’s a true medical emergency, then you are covered for free simply because you are an EU citizen – for anything else you have insurance, or you pay, or you go home!
Illegals may find getting treatment hard under that system, but I’ve only ever heard very vague rumours that anyone’s ever been turned down if they’re really in dire need of medical help.
That’s about the only good thing I have to say about the EU, so it’s probably actually really pretty great!
sounds like a lot of the sentiment here in the US…..
Great list inform! Right-minded wanted to disenchant you recognize you bear a new subscriber- me!
skype…cool and welcome….