Is It Internal Strife?

There is something for everyone……how much chaos can be generated by one op-ed?

The biggest news was not the hearings but rather the op-ed published in the WaPo about the subversion of the Trump White House….and as one might expect Our Dear Leader is raging mad and as usual taking to Twitter…..

There is a “quiet resistance” within the Trump administration that is working to curb some of the president’s “worst inclinations.” That’s according to the author of an anonymous op-ed published by the New York Times on Wednesday. The writer, identified as a senior official in the administration, counts himself or herself as a member of this resistance. But the writer notes that this is not the “popular ‘resistance’ of the Left” and goes on to praise the administration for achievements in areas such as deregulation, tax reform, and a robust military. “But these successes have come despite … the president’s leadership style, which is impetuous, adversarial, petty, and ineffective,” the writer concedes.

While seeking to assure Americans that there “adults in the room,” who are steering the administration “in the right direction until—one way or another—it’s over,” the writer also provides a behind-the-scenes glimpse into Trump’s presidency. The president is amoral and lacks guiding principles, the administration official writes. Meetings “veer off topic” as Trump rants—”his impulsiveness results in half-baked, ill-informed, and occasionally reckless decisions that have to be walked back.” But most worrisome, according to the writer, is the loss of civility that has accompanied Trump’s presidency. Read the whole piece here. The AP describes it as “a striking anonymous broadside,” and says Trump responded by calling the editorial “really a disgrace” and tweeting, “TREASON?” White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders called on the “coward” author to resign.

Now would be a good time to read the op-ed in its entirety….

My readers know where I stand on this person….but now it is time for all the secrecy to end and these anonymous people to stand up and take their place in the resistance…..by the way it is NOT treason to criticize the president….however it is Treason to allow a foreign entity to invade our political process…….

Coward?  If anyone would recognize a coward it would be that Huckabee woman who takes lying to a new high.

Just a thought.

But sports fans there is so much more…..as always Trump went on his typical yada yada tour and told lie after lie…….

“TREASON?” tweeted President Trump after the New York Times published an op-ed from an anonymous administration official who described his leadership style as “impetuous” and “adversarial” and spoke of a “resistance” inside a deeply unstable administration. In a follow-up tweet, the president told the newspaper to reveals the author’s identity, if it wasn’t a “phony source,” the Guardian reports. “If the GUTLESS anonymous person does indeed exist, the Times must, for National Security purposes, turn him/her over to government at once,” Trump said, adding: “I’m draining the Swamp, and the Swamp is trying to fight back. Don’t worry, we will win!” More:

  • “I don’t like them.” Speaking at a meeting of sheriffs from around the country Wednesday afternoon, Trump described both the source and the Times as “failing,” CBS reports. “When you tell me about some anonymous source within the administration, probably who is failing and probably here for all the wrong reasons—and the New York Times is failing—if I weren’t here, I believe the New York Times probably wouldn’t even exist,” he said. They don’t like Donald Trump and I don’t like them,” he said of the Times.

People “stunned” within the Times. The Times‘ newsroom is separate from its opinion department, and sources tell Vanity Fair that people within the paper were “totally stunned” to read the “cry for help” from inside the administration. “It’s a parlor game. Everybody’s trying to figure out who it is, including the Washington bureau,” one senior journalist says. “It feels like a crazy moment.”

  • Sanders wants an apology. White House press secretary Sarah Sanders told the Times it should apologize for the ” pathetic, reckless, and selfish op-ed.” She also said the source is a “coward” who should resign. “He is not putting country first, but putting himself and his ego ahead of the will of the American people,” she said.
  • “Volcanic” anger. In the White House, the hunt for the op-ed’s author is on, insiders tell the Washington Post. The sources say Trump reacted with “volcanic” anger to the op-ed and said he suspects the official either works in the Justice Department or on national security issues. Aides are analyzing language patterns in an effort to find the author, insiders say. They say aides have been texting each other the phrase: “The sleeper cells have awoken.”
  • The guessing game. The AP looks at the “guessing game” people are playing to determine the author. Among the clues: The word “lodestar,” frequently used in Mike Pence’s speeches; could the author be someone close to him, or was it used to throw people off? The Times says the author was described as a “he” by somebody unaware of the author’s identity, meaning it isn’t necessarily a man.
  • Defending anonymity. The Times is defending the controversial and “exceedingly rare” decision to grant anonymity to the author of the op-ed. “It was clear early on that the writer wanted anonymity, but we didn’t grant anything until we read it and we were confident that they were who they said they were,” says op-ed editor James Dao. He says the author set out a “very principled position that deserved an airing.”
  • Is Trump in his element? With the op-ed, the Robert Mueller investigation, and Bob Woodward’s new book, Trump may seem embattled, but his critics should remember that he has “skirted calamity” many times in his career before and gone on to brag about surviving the crisis, writes Michael Kruse at Politico. He says Trump ally Roger Stone told him the “fearless” president makes even Richard Nixon look like a “cream puff.” “Nixon was smarter,” he quotes Stone as saying, “but Trump is tougher.”

People talk about the number of “crises” this administration has had…..maybe it would be easier to keep up with the number of days that there has been no crisis.

0800 hrs…..Hi-ho, Hi-ho It is off to the Docs I go!

See ya seen….chuq

GOP Repeats The Mistakes Of The Left

Professor’s Classroom

Subject:  Political History/Political Science

In case anyone is confused….I have been an activist for over 40+ years and yes I was a Leftist radical in the 60’s……so I did a lot of studying of the history of the Left so I could better try to work magic in political history……well….I tried and it was disastrous….back in the day all the Left did was fight each other on who had the proper ideology….Socialists fought Communist…..Trotskyists fought Stalinists…..Maoists fought Leninists…..Anarchists fought everybody…..there in fighting made the whole movement ineffective in American politics…..

In the early days of the 20th century, shortly after the Russian Revolution, all Leftists parties, most notably the socialists, tried to get the endorsement for Lenin and the Russian Communist Party ….lots of back and forth…lots of lies about the other parties….lots of intrigue until in was given to the Communist Party-USA……..and then the jealousy and games began in earnest…..

Ideology was the battlefield…..which party or organization had the most accurate ideology on the Left…..all this fighting and bickering continued for decades….in the 50’s and 60’s purges were the rule…if people did not hold the proper ideology then they were purged from the party….there was NO compromise….either you believed the ideology of the party blindly or you were purged…..once again…..all this purity BS totally marginalized the Left in American politics…..

Why do I bring up all this “ancient” history?

Excellent question…….it looks like that the GOP may be entering into the pitfalls that the Left suffered from back in the day.  In the last election cycle…..it had begun….the purity thing…….that is if you do not hold the “proper” ideology then the far right will do everything to undermine the moderates and liberals in the Party.

Look at NY-23….the moderate candidate had to bow out because the far right did not like her stands and put up a guy they approved of….even though he could not vote in the district he was running for….he did not know the issues of the district….his ONLY qualification was that he held the “proper” ideology.

And then there is Charlie Crist, the governor of Florida who is running for the Senate and he is a Repub, but the far right endorses Rubio, once again, he has the “proper” ideology.

He should be — he’s no Republican: “This election will be a litmus test to define the will power of party leaders to return to our values,” says Armando Valladores in The Miami Herald. Charlie Crist “hoodwinked” conservatives by raising taxes after promising they would “drop like a rock,” and he trampled conservative values by appointing a pro-abortion justice to the state Supreme Court over a “more-qualified” conservative. “No Republican should vote for Crist.”
“Crist doesn’t deserve GOP support”

These are just a few of the purity issue that I see ….and it looks like it is far from over…..the far right is trying to purge ALL moderates and liberals from the Party.

The far right seems to have NO tolerance for dissenting view within the Party and is trying desperately to purge all who do not have the “proper” ideology.  But the important question is:  can they, the far right, do enough damage to the GOP to make it possible for a successful third party?