Another trigger happy politician.
The US has invaded Mexico a couple of times….once in 1846 and again in 1916…the last time was 1916…..
During the Mexican Revolution (1910-1917), the United States government ordered two military incursions into Mexico. The first entailed an invasion and occupation of the city of Veracruz in 1914, and the second was the “Punitive Expedition” of 1916-1917, commanded by General John J. Pershing. President Woodrow Wilson was reluctant to send U.S. troops to Mexico in 1914, but “yielded to pressure from American business interests, cabinet members, newspapers, and representatives of the Southwest.” Reluctant or not, Wilson desired to depose the government of General Victoriano Huerta by seizing the port of Veracruz, through which flowed most of the armaments and supplies imported for the Mexican army. Wilson’s quarrel with Huerta was twofold: first, Huerta “could not maintain order and protect U.S. private and public interests” in Mexico; and second, Huerta was “a dictator who imposed himself on the Mexican republic after murdering his democratically elected predecessor.” American warships arrived on the scene in April, 1914 and shelled the city, taking “a terrible toll” on the civilian population, which had decided to resist the invasion. At the same time, the U.S. Navy and Marines seized the opportunity to experiment with amphibious landing techniques, with “an almost comic opera” effect. Between the landing and the occupation (which lasted through November) U.S. troops did help oversee the removal of Huerta from office mainly by supplying the revolutionary forces of Venustiano Carranza with arms and other critical materials.
Research: United States Interventions in Mexico
I present this little slice of history because of what that idiot from South Carolina proposed….
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) said Monday that he was prepared to introduce legislation to “set the stage” for US military intervention in Mexico.
Graham’s comments came after four Americans were kidnapped in the Mexican border city of Matamoros, an area said to be dominated by cartels, and two were found dead. He was asked how he would deal with kidnappings or the cartels in general, and said he would get “tough.”
“I would put Mexico on notice,” the hawkish senator told Fox News host Jesse Waters. “If you continue to give safe haven to drug dealers, then you are an enemy of the United States.”
Graham said he agreed with former Attorney General Bill Barr, who wants to declare the cartels “foreign terrorist organizations.” Barr wrote in The Wall Street Journallast week that the US should take military action against cartels.
Barr expressed support for a joint resolution proposed by Reps. Dan Crenshaw (R-TX) and Michael Waltz (R-FL) that would authorize the president to use military force against “those responsible for trafficking fentanyl or a fentanyl-related substance into the United States or carrying out other related activities that cause regional destabilization in the Western Hemisphere.” So far, the resolution has 16 Republican cosponsors.
Graham said he wants to put forward a bill that would designate cartels as terror organizations. “I’m going to introduce legislation, Jesse, to make certain Mexican drug cartels foreign terrorist organizations under US law and set the stage to use military force if necessary to protect America from being poisoned by things coming out of Mexico,” he said.
Other Republicans have called for military intervention in Mexico, which would be a dramatic escalation of America’s decades-old war on drugs. “We should strategically strike and take out the Mexican Cartels, not the Mexican government or their people, but the Mexican Cartels which control them all,” Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) wrote on Twitter on Monday.
Mexican President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador on Tuesday warned the US against military intervention in his country. He said his government was “working and cooperating” with US authorities against cartels but wouldn’t allow “foreign countries” to intervene.
(antiwar.com)
Seriously?
These idiots in DC just want to force war on this country at ever turn.
Hopefully clearer heads will prevail on this issue….but I have NO confidence that they will.
I Read, I Write, You Know
“lego ergo scribo”
If we were to go to war with Mexico, the Russians, the Chinese and North Korea would supply the Mexicans with advanced missiles and we would be up shit creek without a paddle because they have better missiles than we do now because we weren’t smart enough to upgrade our own.
You forgot Iran on your list…..chuq
If we invaded Mexico and won – they may expect us to keep it and support it, and I don’t think anyone wants that!
GP hits the nail on the head. I have always believed what GP just said. I also have long believed that what GP said has been Mexico’s goal for many years now.
God forbid we add those to the rolls. chuq
Not that I’m defending the idiots in the GOP, but they’re not advocating a war with Mexico per se, they’re calling for kinetic attacks against the Cartel’s. Presumably, and preferably with Mexican assistance or acquiescence. Ending the drug war is a good start, but the Cartel’s have amassed a a list of international crimes that would allow plenty of legal cover for some Tier 1 units to drop by and shoot them in the face.
Good idea….let’s just insert ourselves in yet another war zone….chuq
I think you’re missing the point. What I would offer is not a war, but a bilateral activity to decapitate and neutralize the Cartel’s in Mexico. Not an invasion, not an occupation…..not a ‘war zone’.
Was that not the intention with Afghanistan? chuq
No. You seem bent on trying to tie raids to invasions that involve regime change.
My point is that the decision does not track well with our actions. chuq
So….we do what?
I refer you to me answer with the DEA chuq
Or……we can just carry on the status quo and hope for the best…..
The nonsense never ends.
Best wishes, Pete.
So true…these turds will use any excuse to try to start a war. chuq
Who would we be at “war” with? If a SWAT team raids a house and the occupants expectedly resist…..are they then at war with the people of that county or state. Further, what’s your solution? Let the cartel’s be, so we all have something to bitch about online?
Depends on your point of view….in some case SWAT is at ‘war’. Is this not what we have DEA for? Another waste of cash as much as an outright war. chuq