Anarchist? Anarchy? WTF?

Ok recently a bomb was detonated at a military recruitment station in Times Square, NYC.  And shortly a note was sent to the authorities that said Happy New year, We Did It.  The problem with that is that NO ONE knew who “WE” were.  There was no to determine who “we” are.  Then the report was it was not from a terror group mostly likely an anarchist group.  If you do not have a suspect why are they always anarchists?

First of all, does anyone know what an anarchist is?  A hint has nothing to do with bombs.  Anarchy is a form of socialism that says there is no need for the state, theat the people are capable of governing without the state apparatus.  But no where is there a need for bombs.  The anarchist of the media is just that–made up bullsh*t!

Anarchist have been a dirty word in the press and has been used to describe something the press wants.  back in the 1880’s at a May Day parade in Chicago, Hay Market to be exact, a bomb went off and from there forward bombs and anarchist are the same.  It is stupid–It is ignorant and it is moronic!

Enuff said!  Peace Out!

Weekly News UpDate

Still the campaigns are the news that is reported, but every now and then some worthless crap sneaks in.

Most I repeat
Tis news
That no one may use
And it is not complete
Until one has the booze!

1–Discussion on whether a contestant on “Am. Idol” has fake hair.

2–Larry king dances on camera with Janet Jackson–OMG! absolutely no rhythm!

3–Bush dances again on camera–can someone please stop this maddness!

4–Brett Favre retires–sad!

5–yet another plane crash, yet more missing or dead young women, more school lock downs

6–More crappy weather

and a partridge in a pear tree. time for a nap!


Clinton’s Scourched Earth Tactic

She’s destroying the party in order to save it….that seems to be the conclusion of a some opinion writers today…

Obama-backing former Sen. Gary Hary writes: “It will come as a surprise to many people that there are rules in politics. Most of those rules are unwritten and are based on common understandings, acceptable practices, and the best interest of the political party a candidate seeks to lead. One of those rules is this: Do not provide ammunition to the opposition party that can be used to destroy your party’s nominee. This is a hyper-truth where the presidential contest is concerned.

“By saying that only she and John McCain are qualified to lead the country, particularly in times of crisis, Hillary Clinton has broken that rule, severely damaged the Democratic candidate who may well be the party’s nominee, and, perhaps most ominously, revealed the unlimited lengths to which she will go to achieve power. She has essentially said that the Democratic party deserves to lose unless it nominates her.”

All this illustrates that Clinton feels like it is her birthright to be the nominee.  She will win at any cost, even if it means the destruction of the Democratic Party.  Her arrogance and supplying comfort to the enemy, in this case the Republicans, shows that she IS NOT now and will NEVER be a person to be trusted with the leadership of the country.  This just makes her in the same category as Bush, arrogant and selfish and ignorant.

Wyoming Speaks

And it speaks for Obama, now he has an edge in Mississippi because most of the registered Dems are black, which could play into the Obama strategy. His problem is now that Wyoming was the last caucus, where Obama always did well. Now he must fight for the popular vote with Clinton.

That could prove to be a disaster because of this report:

The Clinton campaign has publicly admitted that the only way they can still win this election is by tearing Barack Obama down. They have called their attacks the “kitchen sink strategy,” and Senator Clinton herself has referred to it as “the fun part” of the campaign. The result has been a constant barrage of attacks about Senator Obama’s record that they know full well aren’t true. And yet they repeat them, over and over again, day after day, in an attempt to deceive the American people just so that they can win this election.

Does the Clinton campaign realize they are destroying the party with this stuff? They are breaking rules of the game, especially the one about not saying anything too negative about your party opponent. Plus Clinton has basically told voters that if she is not the nominee then they should vote for McCain.

The DLC is losing its grip on the party and they would rather destroy it than lose its influence.