Hagel On Palin

Sorry…no sarcasm intended.

Nebraska Republican Sen. Chuck Hagel said his party’s vice-presidential nominee, Sarah Palin, lacks foreign policy experience and called it a “stretch” to say she’s qualified to be president.

“She doesn’t have any foreign policy credentials,” Hagel said in an interview published Thursday by the Omaha World-Herald. “You get a passport for the first time in your life last year? I mean, I don’t know what you can say. You can’t say anything.”

“I think it’s a stretch to, in any way, to say that she’s got the experience to be president of the United States,” Hagel said.

Hagel, a senior member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, traveled to Iraq and Afghanistan with Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama in July and had said he would have considered serving as Obama’s running mate.

Seems the Palin-ization of American is beginning to fade.

“McCain Lacks Judgement” Sez Kerry

Senator John F. Kerry said yesterday that John McCain doesn’t have the judgment to be president.

“John McCain . . . has proven that he has been wrong about every judgment he’s made about the war. Wrong about the Iraqis paying for the reconstruction, wrong about whether or not the oil would pay for it, wrong about Sunni and Shi’ite violence through the years, wrong about the willingness of the Iraqis to stand up for themselves,” Kerry said on CBS’s “Face the Nation.”

Interesting considering that McCain was considered as a running mate for Kerry in 2004.  I guess it is a good thing that Kerry did not choose McCain as his Veep or he would not have done so well in the electrion with a man that has little to no good judgement.

WAIT!  Kerry lost that election!  I guess his judgment was not so good either.

McCain Goes South (America)

Sen. John McCain‘s trip to Colombia and Mexico this week made one thing clear: The shape of the United States’ relationship with Latin America will hinge on the outcome of the 2008 election.

The Republican presidential candidate and his Democratic opponent, Sen. Barack Obama, have outlined sharply contrasting visions of how they would conduct relations in the hemisphere. McCain is committed to putting a new emphasis on the region but would pursue many of the policies followed by President Bush in Latin America, with a heavy emphasis on counternarcotics efforts, free trade and a push to curb illegal immigration. Obama has sketched a broad approach that relies more on diplomatic efforts and expression of soft power, through more foreign assistance, an infusion of Peace Corps volunteers and a willingness to meet with hard-line leftist leaders.

The two men’s backgrounds have helped shape their divergent perspectives. McCain has visited Latin America dozens of times and took part in the bitter U.S. policy fights over the region in the 1980s, while Obama has yet to visit a single country there. But both senators are arguing that the United States needs to pursue closer ties with Central and South America to address some of America’s most pressing problems, including illegal immigration, drug trafficking and terrorism.

For decades, U.S. leaders used Latin America as a key battleground in the war against communism, supporting some regimes while seeking to undermine others based on their ideological tilt. It was only in the 1990s that American politicians began to adopt a less explicitly interventionist approach, shifting to a more collaborative relationship based more on economic than political interests.

President Clinton‘s two significant accomplishments involving Latin America during his tenure were pushing the North American Free Trade Agreement through Congress and helping to establish the Summit of the Americas. While President Bush pledged to emphasize relations with the region, the bulk of his foreign policy has focused on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

McCain has made a point of stressing his intimate knowledge of the region during his three-day tour, lavishing praise on Colombian President Álvaro Uribe and Mexican President Felipe Calderón for their efforts to combat drug trafficking and terrorism. In a news conference Thursday at the command center for the Mexican federal judicial police, McCain lauded Uribe for launching a successful raid this week to free 15 hostages held by Marxist rebels, and welcomed a recent anti-narcotics agreement between the United States and Mexico as perhaps “the most important agreement” the two nations have signed.

Some Democratic lawmakers have privately expressed concerns that McCain’s trip may give him an upper hand on Latin American issues, an advantage that seemed to get a boost from McCain’s presence in Colombia on the same day that the 15 hostages were rescued from the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, or FARC. Plans are being made to try to persuade Obama to visit the northern city of Monterrey, one of Mexico’s industrial capitals.

I understand the necessity for good PR, but going South of the border does nothing in the election, other than providing someone with a photo-op.  I would suggest that they concentrate on becoming president and then worry about who does what south of the border.

McCain And The Experience Thingy

This will be the last time that this will reported on in Info Ink, in the last couple of days I have been blasted for my piece on the Clark McCain experience piece, so I decidied to comment one more time.

Stopit! Stop it! Before we go forth please take a moment to flush the emotional BS down the toilet.

I do not think that Wes Clark or myself are impuning McCain’s service to this country–to do so would be political, societal and cultural suicide. Because there is no definitive definition to the word patriotism or national hero, it is purely subjective. To use an obscure concept to say that is experience to be president is absurd. Even McCain has admitted this in past conversations.

As I have said before, a uniform does not make one a patriot, but rather a soldier. The National Hero label is a label and nothing more. To call someone a hero just because they served in the military is to belittle those who have actually done heroic acts.

Few people who have been president have actually had the experie3ncxe to hold the title of president. To get emotional because someone questions another’s experience claim is just dumb and usually comes from those who have no answer to the “real” question of experience.

Try to move past the BS and on to the issues that are most important to the American people. You know those silly issues like the economy, health care, education, war, etc–if we allow the candidates to keep circumventing the issues, then we will have 4 more years of the same BS that we live with today.

America! Get over it! Move on!

Was There A Full Moon?

Lieberman is bumping his gums, making misleading statements, I guess trying to feather his bid for the VP spot.  Then BUsh gets out there and thanx all concerned with the GI Bill including McCain, who by the way was opposed to it.  And then there was Wes Clark…..need I say more?

First let me ask, McCain how he likes the Swift Boat Technique?  If everyone is truly sick of the personal attack stuff, then be the bigger man and stop it!  Personally, I think that the points that Clark made are valid points.  Patriotism is a subjective thing and to try and define it for others is just plain arrogant.  The experience thing, unless the candidate was a VP then none of them have had the executive experience to be president.  Wearing a military uniform is not experience, it is however the sign of a military person serving his country.

The point being that NONE of the candidates are telling the truth and the media is just milking the stories for all they are worth.  Everyone seems so afraid to stating the obvious.  That being on welfare or being a POW is NOT a thing of experience to run this country.  Or that being a pilot or a community activist is not presidential experience.

Please people!  If you step in cow crap, call it what it is—CRAP!

Are You Experienced?

No! Really! Sen. McCain are you truly experienced?

Gen. wesley Clark Weighs in on the experience thingy that McCain and his entourage are claiming.

In a wide-ranging interview with The Huffington Post, Clark offered opinions on the current state of American foreign policy, the Democrats’ emergence as a more “full-service” party on security issues, and — lest anyone doubt his potential use as a running mate for Obama — the shortcomings of Sen. John McCain.

“I know he’s trying to get traction by seeking to play to what he thinks is his strong suit of national security,” Clark said of McCain while speaking from his office in Little Rock, Arkansas. “The truth is that, in national security terms, he’s largely untested and untried. He’s never been responsible for policy formulation. He’s never had leadership in a crisis, or in anything larger than his own element on an aircraft carrier or [in managing] his own congressional staff. It’s not clear that this is going to be the strong suit that he thinks it is.”

Resume aside, though, Clark also took issue with the Arizona Republican’s instincts on national security. “McCain’s weakness is that he’s always been for the use of force, force and more force. In my experience, the only time to use force is as a last resort. … When he talks about throwing Russia out of the G8 and makes ditties about bombing Iran, he betrays a disrespect for the office of the presidency.”

Citing the issue of Iran’s nuclear program, Clark suggested a prime window of opportunity may have been missed early in the Bush presidency, before the election of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. “I think Iran has come out of the Bush administration as a much stronger power,” he said. “First of all, we eliminated the primary blocking force to their west in Iraq. Secondly, we have been ineffective in using the broader tools of U.S. diplomacy and moral suasion in the region — and that’s allowed Iran to capture Hamas, displace Fatah and strengthen [its] grip on Hezbollah. … Without effective diplomatic engagement of Iran, we’ve allowed them to pursue a nuclear program that is likely aimed at achieving nuclear weapons. But we’ve refused to sit down and talk to them about it. … I still favor an effort to engage Iran, but the clock is ticking on their probable nuclear program. This makes everything much more complicated and difficult now.

Gen. Clark is becoming an outspoken critic of McCain and his claims to experience. Does he, Clark, have a plan for the future; maybe VP or Sec of Defense?

The “Blog Bunker” Experience

Yesterday I was interviewed on Sirius Radio, channel 110, “The Blog Bunker”. I do not have Sirius but now I will get it….the questions were very good on the days news….the show is lively and well done..it was an enjoyable experience and would do it again…..I was a bit apprehensive since it had been a long time since I had been interviewed, but it was well done and an excellent show. I recommend it to all, especially if you have strong opinions.

It was pointed out that my title “Weblog” was a bit archaic, but I told them I was an old fart and guess I was having brain farts when I picked a title. But after thinking it over he was right and I have since changed the title.  From this day on “Lobotero’s weblog” will be known as “Lobotero’s Info Ink”.

I would like to thank the staff of “Blog Bunker” after an enjoyable experience.