As a trained foreign service person I cannot find a strategy in all the Trump dealings….so far I still am looking……
Just like a finely tuned sports team the country needs a finely tuned international strategy and the US has nothing of the sort…..I wrote a post about the release of the Us National Strategy……https://lobotero.com/2017/12/26/when-did-national-security-become-a-joke/
Believe it or not…..all this populist rhetoric has had an influence on our strategy…..
The 2017 National Intelligence Community Global Trends report similarly notes the impact of populism on the security environment. Yet, with populist leaders increasingly influencing political discourse and even reaching offices in which they can impact the policies of their respective nations, it has become clear populism is more than just another security issue affecting the strategic terrain. We need to understand how populism impacts strategic decision making in some of the most important nations on earth. Even more importantly, we need to understand how populist politics has and will continue to impact political discourse and decision making within many of our own nations.
Finally someone has written a piece about the strategy and the National Security Strategy…..you see they are not necessarily the same thing…..
Grand strategy may seem an irrelevant idea but it’s not. As Colin Gray declares “all strategy is grand strategy.” Without a grand strategy that explains the ends, works the means and sets out the ways, lower-level strategies will be uncoordinated, work at odds with each other and be unlikely to succeed. Grand strategy seems superfluous as its gotten unhelpfully confused with the National Security Strategy. It should be instead thought of as a practical problem-solving methodology you can apply to particular real-world problems. This article rethinks grand strategy to provide just that.
Grand strategy has a bad wrap but it’s not the concept’s doing. A perception has developed that the National Security Strategy (NSS) and grand strategy are the same. This is a major error. The NSS addresses certain matters of particular Congressional concern as required under the 1986 Goldwater-Nichols Act. The NSS is simply a particular example of a grand strategy, not the whole of grand strategy as a problem-solving approach.
Worse the NSS seems disoriented. The NSS is a late Cold War creation when the Soviet Union was the obvious central focus. Similarly if more generically, grand strategy in originating in war stressed staying focused on the adversary. Post Cold War though, with the USSR dismantled, the NSS lost its concentration, drifting into what John Ikenberry calls a milieu grand strategy, one aiming to shape the general international environment.
Every living person in the US should concern themselves with what is being done in their name……if they could find it in their hearts to do so then the landscape of war would look a lot different than it does today.