
Let’s be clear…Mitt is NOT the only one doing this type of hatch job…..NO party can claim they are above this type of crap! Yes, I said CRAP!

Let’s be clear…Mitt is NOT the only one doing this type of hatch job…..NO party can claim they are above this type of crap! Yes, I said CRAP!
I will bet that you are sitting there asking if the old professor has lost his ever loving mind. No I have not….but you might want to read this because I have a feeling we may be hearing a lot about the region in the future……..
![]()
The current unrest in Balochistan centers around forced disappearances, kidnappings, targeted killings, assassinations and terrorism. However, these are merely the tactics of a much broader, more geopolitically complex war in which the United States and its Western allies are engaged. Though seemingly insignificant against the backdrop of all the regional and international crises affecting our world, Balochistan is, in fact, a nexus: the point at which diametrically opposing strategic interests converge.
The United States views Balochistan, an area that encompasses western Pakistan, eastern Iran, and a piece of southern Afghanistan, as critical to the maintenance of US hegemony in the Middle East and Central and South Asia. Conversely, China regards the region as necessary for its own economic and political evolution into a world superpower. Seen in this way, Balochistan becomes central to the development of geopolitical power in the 21stCentury.
Balochistan’s Strategic Location
Balochistan is located in one of the most geographically and politically significant places anywhere in the world. Not only does the region sit astride three countries which have become central to Western political and military power projection, it is also central to the development and export of energy from Central Asia, access to the Indian Ocean, and a host of other geopolitical imperatives for both the West and the SCO/BRICS countries. Because of this, the region has grown exponentially in importance to all the major powers of the world.
This may not mean much right now….but in the future you can look back and say that the old professor had our backs with the coming problems……if it happens the MSM will not be giving the whole story………as usual.