What Part Of This Moves The Country Forward?

In the last couple of weeks abortion has once again taken front row importance in politics……

First in Georgia……

One, two, three—and now, four. Georgia has passed a bill banning abortions after a detectable fetal “heartbeat,” making it the fourth US state to pass such a law this year, per Vox. “All life has value, all life matters and all life is worthy of protection,” Gov. Brian Kemp said Tuesday in signing the bill more than a month after it passed the legislature, per the Atlanta Journal Constitution. As in Ohio, Kentucky, and Mississippi, court challenges await. Critics say the bill equals a near-total abortion ban as fetal cardiac activity is detected just six weeks into pregnancy, before many women know they’re pregnant. It “flies in the face of 50 years of US Supreme Court precedent,” says Andrea Young of Georgia’s ACLU. “We will see Governor Kemp in court.”

Unless it’s struck down, the law will go into effect in January with exceptions when the mother’s life is at risk or for “the accidental or unintentional injury to or death of an unborn child.” Unlike Ohio’s law, a woman in Georgia can also obtain an abortion after the fetal heartbeat is detected in cases of rape or incest, though she’ll need to provide a police report. Otherwise, mothers, doctors, nurses, and pharmacists could be subject to criminal prosecution for seeking, performing, or assisting in an abortion once a heartbeat is heard.

Then came the Alabama law…….

After rejecting an attempt to add an exception for rape or incest, Alabama’s Senate passed the nation’s strictest abortion law Tuesday. The bill, which passed by a vote of 25-6, makes performing an abortion at any stage of pregnancy a felony punishable by up to 99 years or life in prison, the Guardian reports. Four Republican senators joined Democrats in voting in favor of the rape or incest exception, which was defeated 21-11. The only exception that remained in the bill is for women whose health is at serious risk. The bill—which punishes doctors, not women seeking abortions—will now head to the desk of Gov. Kay Ivey, whose office says she won’t make a decision until she sees the final version of the legislation, reports AL.com. (Not to worry the gov signed it into law)

I have one question….but before I ask it…..on a personal note…I am against abortion but it is never my decision to make and therefore it has definitely not the government’s place to make it either.

I understand the state’s push to limit voting or gerrymandering….that moves a political agenda and benefits a party over another.

With that said….this push for the overturning of Roe v Wade…..what does it do for the country?  Does it improve the infrastructure?  Does it improve the income of states?  Does it create any jobs?  Does it help feed the hungry?  Or house the homeless?  Maybe help keep the border safe?

Just what in Hell does this energy, time and money actually do for the state that the laws have been passed?

This is how you do it.  This is how you overturn a law that you do  not like.  Chip away at it until the emotions run high and you get stuff done.

It has taken 50+ years and all that whining and bitching could pay off when this makes it to the Supreme Court….this is how you force a belief on a country that does not agree with you.

To me this is a worthless endeavor that does NOTHING to improve the country and the lives of the people.

Ain’t democracy great?

Talbert Swan put something on Twitter that rings true…..

Only in American can you be:

Pro-Death Penalty– Pro-Unrestricted Gun Rights– Pro-War Pro-Preemptive Strikes– Pro-Torture– Pro-Healthcare Repeal Pro-Police, defending every extrajudicial murder of an unarmed  persons… …and still perfidiously call yourself ‘Pro-Life.’

Well said!

Advertisements

15 thoughts on “What Part Of This Moves The Country Forward?

  1. >>I am against abortion but it is never my decision to make and therefore it has definitely not the government’s place to make it either.

    I fully agree with this one as with the general argument of this post.

    1. Thanx my thought is if one needs one or not it is an individual decision and I find it humorous from a party that preaches accountability and responsibility does not want the voter to have either….chuq

  2. Your last paragraph sums up the ‘American dilemma’ perfectly.
    I wrote about my own opinions on the subject on Doug’s blog, so won’t repeat all that here.
    Best wishes, Pete.

    1. Read what I had to say to Mordanicus…..this is just a silly emotional BS attempt to control the person by a party that says it stands against such….chuq

      1. “In Virginia, Del. Kathy Tran sponsored legislation called the Repeal Act and initially claimed it would let a woman who was dilated and about to give birth receive a third-trimester abortion. The measure received support from Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam, who attracted scrutiny in February for appearing to suggest the bill would allow infanticide.

        “If a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen,” Northam said. “The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother.”

        Northam later said his comments about the measure were “mischaracterized,” and Tran said she misspoke. The legislation was tabled and not passed by the state.”

        Been hearing a lot about this post birth stuff but don’t know what states or laws passed if any other examples. The possibilities jacked outrage in anti abortion reaction. I’ve heard others report that they expect these no abortion new law to be struct down as court reaffirms Roe as accepted law but what they are really trying to do is get the court to define at what moment the fetus is a person. With that they intend to refine anti abortion law to be congruent with that determination because a person has protections under law.

      2. I have heard the statement even the president has used it on the stump…..I do n ot think this has any bearing to the laws passed lately…….and I still do not see any of them benefit the nation as a whole…..what does it do to move us forward? chuq

Leave a Reply to GP Cox Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.