Others Say ‘NO’ To Dems Health Reform

I try to be fair and balanced in my writings and I try to give all sides to a debate on policy….

Not everyone is thrilled with the proposals that the Dems are offering up as health reform…….this from the Green Party, USA:

The ‘public option’ in the bill would enroll only 2% of the population by 2019. According to the Congressional Budget Office, the public option “would cost more than private plans” since it would enroll primarily the poorest and sickest members of society. Insurance companies will probably end up administering the public option plan. (Single-Payer ends the provision of health coverage by insurance companies, which raise health costs by nearly a third to cover overhead, administrative costs, CEO salaries, and profits for shareholders.)

Access to health insurance will still primarily be tied to employment. An employee who loses his or her job will still lose coverage. Employers, not employees, will choose their workers’ insurance company and their health care provider. (Single-Payer relieves businesses of the burden of providing health insurance benefits and allows Americans to choose their physician or hospital.)

The House bill further increases health care spending. The US already spends nearly double ($7,200 per capita) what other industrial countries spend for their citizens. To reduce the increase in costs to the federal government, the Democrats’ plan would push more and more of the financial burden for health care onto state governments and consumers, while reducing subsidies to consumers. (Past studies by the GAO and CBO confirm that Single-Payer would save hundreds of billions of dollars annually in total health care spending.)

The House bill denies health care for all immigrants, a restriction that would ultimately cost the US more in money and lives, since denial of treatment to anyone encourages the spread of disease among everyone, regardless of health coverage. (Single-Payer’s financial savings would fully offset the cost of health care for immigrants and improve the quality of health care for all.)

Tens of millions of Americans will either not be required to purchase insurance or will choose to pay a penalty rather than do so. Those who buy subsidized plans, mostly the working poor, will find that many services are not covered and that they will lack the funds to pay the deductibles and co-pays needed for medical treatment, since the plans are designed to only cover 70% of costs. (Single-Payer will offer comprehensive health care for everyone.)

The Dems have a hard sell even to their staunchest supporters…..it will be interesting to see how the final version of the bill will shake out……I bet that it will look nothing like a real reform bill….any takers?

GOP Repeats The Mistakes Of The Left

Professor’s Classroom

Subject:  Political History/Political Science

In case anyone is confused….I have been an activist for over 40+ years and yes I was a Leftist radical in the 60’s……so I did a lot of studying of the history of the Left so I could better try to work magic in political history……well….I tried and it was disastrous….back in the day all the Left did was fight each other on who had the proper ideology….Socialists fought Communist…..Trotskyists fought Stalinists…..Maoists fought Leninists…..Anarchists fought everybody…..there in fighting made the whole movement ineffective in American politics…..

In the early days of the 20th century, shortly after the Russian Revolution, all Leftists parties, most notably the socialists, tried to get the endorsement for Lenin and the Russian Communist Party ….lots of back and forth…lots of lies about the other parties….lots of intrigue until in was given to the Communist Party-USA……..and then the jealousy and games began in earnest…..

Ideology was the battlefield…..which party or organization had the most accurate ideology on the Left…..all this fighting and bickering continued for decades….in the 50’s and 60’s purges were the rule…if people did not hold the proper ideology then they were purged from the party….there was NO compromise….either you believed the ideology of the party blindly or you were purged…..once again…..all this purity BS totally marginalized the Left in American politics…..

Why do I bring up all this “ancient” history?

Excellent question…….it looks like that the GOP may be entering into the pitfalls that the Left suffered from back in the day.  In the last election cycle…..it had begun….the purity thing…….that is if you do not hold the “proper” ideology then the far right will do everything to undermine the moderates and liberals in the Party.

Look at NY-23….the moderate candidate had to bow out because the far right did not like her stands and put up a guy they approved of….even though he could not vote in the district he was running for….he did not know the issues of the district….his ONLY qualification was that he held the “proper” ideology.

And then there is Charlie Crist, the governor of Florida who is running for the Senate and he is a Repub, but the far right endorses Rubio, once again, he has the “proper” ideology.

He should be — he’s no Republican: “This election will be a litmus test to define the will power of party leaders to return to our values,” says Armando Valladores in The Miami Herald. Charlie Crist “hoodwinked” conservatives by raising taxes after promising they would “drop like a rock,” and he trampled conservative values by appointing a pro-abortion justice to the state Supreme Court over a “more-qualified” conservative. “No Republican should vote for Crist.”
“Crist doesn’t deserve GOP support”

These are just a few of the purity issue that I see ….and it looks like it is far from over…..the far right is trying to purge ALL moderates and liberals from the Party.

The far right seems to have NO tolerance for dissenting view within the Party and is trying desperately to purge all who do not have the “proper” ideology.  But the important question is:  can they, the far right, do enough damage to the GOP to make it possible for a successful third party?